separation of powers essay conclusion

Entertainment & Pop Culture
Geography & Travel
Health & Medicine
Lifestyles & Social Issues
Philosophy & Religion
Politics, Law & Government
Sports & Recreation
Visual Arts
World History
On This Day in History
Biographies
Top Questions
Week In Review
Infographics
Demystified
Image Galleries
One Good Fact
Britannica Explains In these videos, Britannica explains a variety of topics and answers frequently asked questions.
Britannica Classics Check out these retro videos from Encyclopedia Britannica’s archives.
#WTFact Videos In #WTFact Britannica shares some of the most bizarre facts we can find.
This Time in History In these videos, find out what happened this month (or any month!) in history.
Demystified Videos In Demystified, Britannica has all the answers to your burning questions.
Student Portal Britannica is the ultimate student resource for key school subjects like history, government, literature, and more.
COVID-19 Portal While this global health crisis continues to evolve, it can be useful to look to past pandemics to better understand how to respond today.
100 Women Britannica celebrates the centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment, highlighting suffragists and history-making politicians.
Britannica Beyond We’ve created a new place where questions are at the center of learning. Go ahead. Ask. We won’t mind.
Saving Earth Britannica Presents Earth’s To-Do List for the 21st Century. Learn about the major environmental problems facing our planet and what can be done about them!
SpaceNext50 Britannica presents SpaceNext50, From the race to the Moon to space stewardship, we explore a wide range of subjects that feed our curiosity about space!
Introduction
Facts & Related Content
What Is an Executive Order?
More Articles On This Topic
Contributors
Article History

separation of powers

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

separation of powers , division of the legislative , executive , and judicial functions of government among separate and independent bodies. Such a separation, it has been argued, limits the possibility of arbitrary excesses by government, since the sanction of all three branches is required for the making, executing, and administering of laws.

The doctrine may be traced to ancient and medieval theories of mixed government, which argued that the processes of government should involve the different elements in society such as monarchic , aristocratic , and democratic interests. The first modern formulation of the doctrine was that of the French political philosopher Montesquieu in De l’esprit des lois (1748; The Spirit of Laws ), although the English philosopher John Locke had earlier argued that legislative power should be divided between king and Parliament .

Montesquieu’s argument that liberty is most effectively safeguarded by the separation of powers was inspired by the English constitution , although his interpretation of English political realities has since been disputed. His work was widely influential, most notably in America , where it profoundly influenced the framing of the U.S. Constitution . That document further precluded the concentration of political power by providing staggered terms of office in the key governmental bodies.

Modern constitutional systems show a great variety of arrangements of the legislative, executive, and judicial processes, and the doctrine has consequently lost much of its rigidity and dogmatic purity. In the 20th century, governmental involvement in numerous aspects of social and economic life resulted in an enlargement of the scope of executive power, a trend that accelerated after World War II . Some who fear the consequences of that development for individual liberty have favoured establishing means of appeal against executive and administrative decisions (for example, through an ombudsman), rather than attempting to reassert the doctrine of the separation of powers. See also checks and balances .

Back to School Offer

Get 20% of Your First Order amount back in Reward Credits!

Get 20% of Your First Order back in Rewards

Separation of Powers, Essay Example

Pages: 1

Words: 324

This Essay was written by one of our professional writers.

You are free to use it as an inspiration or a source for your own work.

Need a custom Essay written for you?

The US Constitution provides for the separation of powers between various branches of the government. The system of separation of powers was designed to present a series of checks and balances among the various areas of political, legal, and economic power that were envisioned as being part of the American Constitutional democracy. Articles 1-3 of the Constitution describe the way in which the government is to be structured in order to achieve and preserve the separation of powers. Briefly, the articles call for the creation of three basic branches of government. These three branches are: the legislative branch, the judiciary branch, and the executive branch. The three branches together form a system of mutual support and restriction which, theoretically, provides for the coherent functioning of the federal government while simultaneously preventing the conservation of power by any single group or person.

Article One provides for the creation of the legislative branch, which is the American Congress. the American congress is, itself, a ” bicameral Congress composed of the Senate and the House of Representatives” (The Columbia Encyclopedia). Among the most important powers of the legislative branch are the powers of law-making and investigation. Article Two of the Constitution provides for the executive branch of government. The executive branch is led by the President. Among the most important of the President’s powers are the Presidential war-powers, and the Presidential veto. Article three provides for the creation of the judiciary branch of government. Among the most notable power of the judiciary is the interpretation of law and the creation of Supreme Court which assets Federal law of State law. The three main branches of government that are described by the articles of the Constitution form the basis of a system of checks and balances that is meant to reduce the domination of powerful interests or individuals.

Works Cited

Constitution of the United States. 2009. In The Columbia Encyclopedia 6th ed., edited by Lagass, Paul. New York: Columbia University Press.

Stuck with your Essay?

Get in touch with one of our experts for instant help!

Education and Early Care Policy, Essay Example

Philosophy, Essay Example

Time is precious

don’t waste it!

It's a Free, No-Obligation Inquiry!

Plagiarism-free guarantee

Privacy guarantee

Secure checkout

Money back guarantee

Get a Free E-Book ($50 in value)

How To Write The Best Essay Ever!

Related Essay Samples & Examples

Sense of safety in the books when no one is watching and obsidian, essay example.

Pages: 4

Words: 1116

What It Means to Call the Bible a Word of God, Essay Example

Pages: 5

Words: 1470

How Is “Kedusha” (Holiness) Conceptualized in Judaism? Essay Example

Pages: 3

Words: 918

What Effects Has the Internet Had on Disability? Essay Example

Pages: 2

Words: 672

A Visit to Alien Planet, Essay Example

Words: 571

Revolutionary France 1789-1793, Essay Example

Pages: 9

Words: 2343

Need a professionally written Custom Essay?

We will write it for you, in any discipline! Starting at only

$9.45 a page

Wait, please!

Right now, you can get a professionally written essay in any discipline with a

10% discount!

Please, check your email for the offer!

We're now sending you a link to download your e-book, please check your e-mail. Thank you!

Thank you for the subscription!

You can receive the notifications now. It's pleasure to stay in touch!

Get a Free E-Book ($50 in value)

Essay On Separation Of Powers

Federal government dbq.

Each branch of government has control over their duty. The legislative branch has to power to approve presidential nominations, override a President’s veto, impeach President, and remove him or her from office. The executive branch can veto congressional legislation (Doc C). The judicial branch can confirm the President’s nominations, and it can declare presidential acts unconstitutional. Each of the branches of government keep each other in check. This act is called checks and balances. Each branch of government checks on another to keep them balanced. This guards the U.S. Constitution against tyranny because one branch does not overpower

The Constitution Guarded Against Tyranny Dbq

Checks and balances prevents any one branch from having too much power. [Doc C is an excerpt from Federalist Paper #51 written by James Madison in 1788. The Federalist Papers were papers written to convince people to ratify the Constitution.] According to Doc C, ”...the constant aim is to divide and arrange several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other…” In this quote, Madison is saying that *the Constitution made the three branches divided in a way that they can watch and check over each other. This system guards against tyranny because it ensures that the three branches won’t overpower one another.* This shows how the Constitution uses a system of checks and balances to guard against

Compare And Contrast Federalism Checks And Balances

The three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) have respective powers that enable each of them to "check and balance" the other two branches. This was done because the drafters of the constitution didn 't want any one person or group of persons to have too much power. An example of checks and balances in action is how Congress voted overwhelmingly to override a veto by President Obama for the first time, passing into law a bill that would allow the families of those killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to sue Saudi Arabia for any role in the

How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay

What is tyranny and how do you guard against it? Tyranny is most often defined as harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual - like a king or a dictator. The constitution was created May of 1787, in Philadelphia. “The accumulation of all powers … in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” It was made to replace the old constitution, the Articles of Confederation (Background Essay). How did the constitution guard tyranny? The constitution guards against tyranny by the powers of the government, the 3 branches of the government, checks and balances, and the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Philadelphia 1787: How The Constitution Guards Against Tyranny

The separation of powers is a way for the branches to not have to much power. For example, according to James Madison, Federalist #47, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distant.” This means that the branches should not all have the same powers and should be very different from each other and not have to much power over one another. Separation of powers helps guard against tyranny by not allowing the branches to be too close to each other or this could very lead to tyranny. The branches should be close enough to check up on each other and have everything fair but not to close to where we could have tyranny in our government and

How Did Federalist 51 Impact Today's Government

James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past.

Essay On Divided Government

Divided government occurs when one political party controls the presidency and another controls one or both houses of Congress. The struggle between parties can create significant issues for the government, including the appointment of judges and high officials and the creation of effective problem-solving legislation.

Why Did The Articles Of Confederation Fail

Texas Constitution Pros And Cons

A constitution is the fundamental law by which a nation or a state is governed and organized. It establishes the framework of government, delegates the powers and duties of governmental bodies, and defines the relationship between the government and their citizens. Texas current constitution was adopted in 1876, and since then Texas voters have approved more than 467 amendments to this document. The word “amendment” is defined as the act or process of changing the words or the meaning of a law or document (constitution). Throughout this essay I will explain the rules for amending the Texas Constitution, the attempts made at constitutional reforms during the 1970s, explain why constitutional reforms were attempted and why it ultimately failed.

4th Amendment Research Paper

On July 4, 1776 the Declaration of Independence was signed and The United States of America declared itself a separate and independent nation. On June 21, 1788 the United States Constitution was made official, replacing the Articles of Confederation. Since its ratification, the Constitution has been amended several times in order to better apply to current times and situations the Founding Fathers could not have predicted. Despite all the changes the Constitution has gone through, its core principles remain.

Articles Of Confederation And Separation Of Powers

Separation of powers protects liberty by making sure that all government powers do not fall in the hands of a single person or a group of people it also ensure that one branch does not exercise the powers of another branch. The legislative branch is mainly responsible for lawmaking, in article one of the constitution congress is granted limited but substantial legislative power. For Example, in section 8 it mentions “congress shall have the power to establish Post offices and Post roads meaning that neither the executive branch nor the Judiciary branch can exercise these powers. The Executive branch is mainly responsible for enforcing laws, Article II of the constitution grants executive power to the President, Some of the president’s powers are to veto legislation, recommend legislation, grant pardons and nominate judges. The Judicial branch is the law interpreting branch of government, article III of the constitution establishes a federal system of courts that are separate from the state courts, judges are appointed for life unless they are impeached and judges are also independent of the other two branches and through their exercise of judicial powers judges cannot be threatened by either the executive or the legislative branch. Separation of powers helps guarantees that all government power doesn’t

Dual Federalism

This method of separation is known as “checks and balances” referring to the three branches of government the executive, legislative, and judicial branch. The legislative branch is supposed to be the stronger one. It consists of the Congress divided in two chambers: a House of Representatives and a Senate. The members of the House of Representatives are elected by the people and have the responsibility of encouraging popular consent and the Senate is elected by the state legislatures. The executive branch consists of the president, who has the power to receive international ambassadors, negotiate treaties with acceptance of the Senate, and appoint major personnel. The judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court, which has the right to solve any dispute between national and regional

Analysis Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

Ever heard of the Articles of Confederation? Thought not. That’s because within only 8 years of their ratification, they were gotten rid of. This was because, among other things, there were no courts, no national currency, and no taxes. So in May of 1787, 55 men gathered together in Philadelphia to come up with a better plan. They wanted a new form of government that gave power to the people, states, and the federal government. But most importantly, they wanted a government that would prevent tyranny. After 3½ months, they came up with the Constitution. It was meant to establish a Federalist government, spread out power between 3 different branches of government, put in place a system of checks and balances, and give states equal and proportionate

Similarities Between The Articles Of Confederation And Tyranny

In the event that the president tries to take the force of another branch, than the legislative branch can impeach the president. This is one of the checks of the legislative branch on the Executive branch . Every branch has a check of another branch, so if one branch is doing something unconstitutional , another branch can check the unconstitutional decision , and fix the issue. This guards against one branch taking power over the other

More about Essay On Separation Of Powers

Separation of Powers

Info: 1528 words (6 pages) Essay Published: 18th Jul 2019

Reference this

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Separation of powers is when the state is divided into three different governmental bodies (legislature, executive and judiciary); and all three bodies have separate and independent powers and areas of responsibility. The effect of separation of powers, is removing the amount of power in any groups hands, so in essence it makes it difficult for them to abuse it. I would be discussing three obvious breaches of separation of power, and whether they are beneficial or detrimental to the system.

When discussing about the breach of the separation of powers in the United Kingdom, it can be related to the Lord Chancellor. He has been a part of all three governmental bodies for years (legislature, judiciary and executive).

The lord chancellor is involved in legislature, by been in the upper chamber as the speaker of the House of Lords, which means he is in charge and in control of every decisions that comes out of the House of Lords, and has a vote. As been the head of the House of Lords, he represents the house in both international and domestic events.

He is also a major team player in the judiciary aspects of things, by been able to sit as a senior judge in the court of appeal, the Privy Council or the appellate committee. The Lord Chancellor is also the holder of the great seal, and the head of the judiciary in both England and Wales, and also the president of the Supreme Court. He also played a major role in the appointments of judicial posts and Law Lords, because the prime minister would consult him on suitable candidates.

Prior to the constitutional reform act 2005, the Lord Chancellor held unto all three aspects of the governmental bodies. Previously Lord Hailsham defended the judges by saying “the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law should be defended from inside the cabinet as well as inside parliament”. The Lord Chancellor also acted as a spokesperson for the judges for many years, by defending their interference with the executives, until recently when the disadvantage outweighed the advantage that it is a major breach of the separation of powers.

The constitutional Reform Act 2005, redefined the office of the Lord Chancellor, which made sure there was a major separation of power between the executive, judiciary and legislature. The Lord Chancellor is no longer the head of the judiciary, and does not sit as a judge or the speaker in the House of Lords. He is still involved with the judiciary process, but with less influence. The act prohibits the office holder of the Lord Chancellor from holding judicial office.

The Lord Chancellors role in the United Kingdom has been an ongoing debate for years, and have been widely criticised. A bit of separation has been put in practice, but the Lord Chancellor role is still in certain aspects involved in all three parts of the governmental body. It is yet to be decided, but if a definite separation is made, it would be beneficial to all three aspects of the governmental body.

Delegated legislation is another major form of separation of powers. Delegated legislation can also be known as subordinate legislation, which occurs when executive’s bodies are given the power to make laws, instead of the parliamentary body (legislature), for example local councils by-laws. Delegated legislation has a major overlap involving the executives performing a legislative function.

Legislations may be made by ministers (in the form of rules and regulation), local authorities (in the form of bylaws), public bodies (in the forms of rules and regulation), judges (in the form of rules of court), government departments (in the form of codes of practice, circulars and guidance) and the House of Commons (in the form of resolutions of the house).

Delegated legislation raises questions relating to the supremacy of parliament, because in a parliamentary year about 3,000 laws are passed; but the volume of legislation reveals its importance as a source of law.

Although the powers are in the hands of executive bodies, they are under strict instructions to only pass legislation that are intra vires, which are within the legal powers that are conferred by the act; but if the executives go against the rules, the legislation they pass will then be made ultra vires by the courts, which abolishes the law.

By restricting the executives, the courts are trying to put legal controls on the legislation made, and also trying to show that giving the powers to the executives are not violating the separation of powers. Chester v Bateson is an example of the courts control over the use of delegated legislation.

A major practical benefit of the laws created by delegated legislation is flexibility. Although there are both political and legal controls over delegated legislation, because “it should be remembered that the vast majority of domestic legislation which is passed is delegated, not primary Acts of parliament.”

The benefits of delegated legislation, is that unlike an act of parliament, it cannot be challenged in a court of law; which could possibly delay the process. They can also be passed due to the local needs, which can be well-suited in meeting the different needs of local communities.

Judicial reviews can challenge delegated legislation in courts, because they are the only once with the control. if a piece of legislation is made against the statutory procedures, they can be struck down; they can also get challenged on the grounds of irrationality, which was held in Kruse v Johnson, where it was held that a by-law which was unequal in its operation as between different classes.

If the power of delegated legislation is retrieved, it could affect inner-cities and communities, because it is a reliable way out to solve problems instead of waiting for parliament. The parliamentary body would also feel under a lot of pressure, due to the amount of work load waiting to be answered, which would slow down the process of laws been made and needs been met.

The Privy Council is another form of a breach in the separation of powers. The Privy Council are the inner council of advisers to the queen; they are also the chief policy making governmental body. There are over 500 members of the Privy Council, and they comprise of people who hold or have held political or judicial offices, for example peers, cabinet ministers, senior judges, prime ministers and the archbishops.

The Privy Council has an overlap in relation to the separation of powers, relating to the executive and judicial function of government.

The main function of the Privy Council is judicial, because it makes orders in council and also grants royal charters to public bodies, which are also known as non-statutory orders. The Privy Council can also make laws in the form of delegated legislation, which includes transferring power from one to another. They still remain the highest court of appeal for commonwealth nations, and for certain courts and tribunals. The judicial committee members are law lords or ex-law lords. The Privy Council are also an advisory body to the queen, for example to advise the queen whether or not to declare war, which used to be their main function previously.

The idea of the Privy Council been an executive body but has an overlap by performing both the legislative and judiciary function is a major issue in United Kingdom, because it losses it major function, and now makes legislations. The overlap can also be ascribed to the members for example the Lord Chancellor is one of the active members of the privy council, but also has a major role to play in the House of Lords and also as a judge, which could be one of the major downfall to the overlap.

The amount of overlap between the three governmental functions is such that no clear separation of power can be said to exist. A major advantage to having a clear separation of power is the sense of efficiency in government, and not having too much power in the hand of certain individuals which could lead to dictatorship. It also creates a sense of closeness in the relationships between all three functions.

The fundamental rule of separation of power is to create a balance in order to enable effectiveness. Although a separation of power is needed, but if there was no interaction between all three functions, a government would not be possible, because all three organs of the government help and work together in order to improve each other efforts. For example if the executive has no input in legislation, then the government’s policies could not be implemented.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Related Services

Law Essay Writing Service

Law Dissertation Writing Service

Student reading and using laptop to study

Law Assignment Writing Service

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on LawTeacher.net then please:

Jurisdictions / Tags

Our academic writing and marking services can help you!

Freelance Writing Jobs

Looking for a flexible role? Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher?

Study Resources

Free resources to assist you with your legal studies!

Crazy Law Facts

Take a look at some weird laws from around the world!

Search Support Articles

*You can also browse our support articles here >

The Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances Essay

Separation of powers dbq essay.

Separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism are ways the government doesn't have too much power. Separation of powers makes sure no one gets too much power. Checks and Balances makes sure the three branches can monitor each other. Federalism is a system of government where the states government shares power with the national government. The founders of the constitution included the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism in order to prevent the government from being too powerful.

DBQ Summary : Federalism And Tyyranny

Next, checks and balances is each branch of government can agree or disagree with something in other branch that keep the branch of government equally so no tyranny won't happen “(the three branches) should not be so far separated to have no constitutional control over each other”(Doc C). The legislative branch can approve presidential nominations, override president's veto and impeach the president and remove him or her from office for executive branch but for judicial branch, the senate confirms the president nomination, congress can impeach judges and remove office.The separation of power constantly prevents tyranny from happening by dividing power and each power check each other.The judicial branch can declare presidential acts unconstitutional for executive branch same as legislative branch. The check and Balance against tyranny because it let every branch check each other without putting power in one hand.

The Structure Of Our American Government Essay

With the U.S. Constitution one of the strengths is how it divides federal powers between three main branches, legislative, executive, and judicial. Which is defined by the separation of powers doctrine, and provides a system of checks and balances to prevent one branch from overpowering the other. This is why separation of powers is important because if one person had unlimited power, then others would be suppressed. The separation of powers divides certain tasks among the three branches so that they can check

Explain How The Constitution Provides For A System Of Checks And Balances

The Separation of Powers formulated by the composers of the Constitution was intended to do one essential thing: to keep the greater part from ruthless control. In light of their experience, the designers shied far from giving any branch of the new government a lot of power. The separation of power gives an arrangement of shared force known as Checks and Balances. The three Branches that are created in the Constitution are the Legislatives (consisted of House and Senate), the Executive (consisted of the President, Vice President, the Departments), and the Judicial (consisted of Federal and Supreme Court). All branches come with certain

7 Principles Of The Constitution

The Separation of Powers is important because of many different reasons. First, the power in the government is split up into three branches including the following: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. This helps distribute the power and not have any collisions between who has what. Also, all three branches are able to do their own things but in the end they all have the same goal. With this certain principle, this allows the government to run smoothly and stay on track. Overall, this is a very important role that cannot be changed.

Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances

Checks and balances does not separate the powers, rather it expands off of it. Checks and balances gives each entity of government a different advantage over the other.

Judicial Branch: The Government's Ear Essay

6 Works Cited

The Judicial Branch is the balancing factor of the Government. It is the listener of the people of the US and it decides on all matters regarding the people. It "interprets the nation's law" (World Book 141). Being able to interpret the law gives the Judicial branch a special kind of power. One of which the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch do not possess. The Judicial branch decides when a law has been broken, to what extent, and how to punish the criminal act. And that is what makes it the strongest branch.

The Constitutional Convention Of Philadelphia Essay

One of the most important principles incorporated in the U.S. Constitution is separation of powers. The U.S. Constitution divided the central government into three branches and created a system of checks and balances as a way to prevent the concentration of power. “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” In order to be sure that the main

Checks And Balances Essay

The Judicial Review it helps to make sure that all new laws passed do not voglite the constitution. Or are rights as citizens. This power however is weekend by a slow to act congress. It is also strengthened by the changing opinions of the court judges. The job of the federal government is to lead but also protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens. Judicial review accomplishes this by insuring that laws are checked with the constitution.

‘the Separation of Powers Hinders Effective Government in the Usa!’ Do You Agree?

The separation of powers is a theory of government whereby political power is distributed among three branches of government; the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The doctrine of the separation of powers embodies three basic principles; limited government, which means that the government’s power over its citizens is limited by the Bill of Rights. Secondly is the separation of personnel, meaning that no one person can hold office in separate branches of the government at the same time. And lastly, each branch of government keeps a watch over the other branches of government and in some cases can overrule it to prevent them from becoming too powerful.

The Framers Of A Just Government In The 1787 Constitution

Framers of the constitution feared tyranny within the government. To avoid this, checks and balances were put into place. These checks and balances of power ensured that the branches of government did not violate their respective power and that no forms of legislation should go into effect without being checked by all branches. A Just government should have this system because it provides an equal field on which the legislative, executive, and judicial branch can propose, pass, or deny bills. If we as a people are going to give someone else power,then there should be a system in which those people are checked and kept in line, so that our country remains free. Separation of power was also put into place as a way to keep all the branches equal. Each branch was given a

Law 421 Week 1 Dq1 Essay

3) (The judicial branch) oversees the court system of the U.S. Through court cases, the judicial branch explains the meaning of the Constitution and laws passed by Congress. The Supreme Court is the head of the judicial branch. Unlike a criminal court, the Supreme Court rules whether something is constitutional or unconstitutional—whether or not it is permitted under the Constitution.

Checks and Balances Essay

The legislative branch, Congress, has the power to make laws valid for the whole country. Powers like the regulation of taxes, regulation of commerce between the states and with foreign countries, the power to declare war, and the power to impeach the President are some of the issues the legislative branch has to deal with. Congress has two chambers (or "houses"): the Senate and the House of Representatives ("the house").

ESSAY SAUCE

FOR STUDENTS : ALL THE INGREDIENTS OF A GOOD ESSAY

Essay: The doctrine of separation of powers

Essay details and download:.

Text preview of this essay:

This page of the essay has 1,336 words. Download the full version above.

Discuss the doctrine of separation of powers. Do you think that the separation of powers in the United Kingdom is sufficient? Separation of powers is a principle set out by Montesquieu in the 17th century after observing the British System of the time. The doctrine of the separation of powers sets out that there are three distinct entities at the centre of the decision and law making process. Montesquieu believed that the best safeguard against tyranny was the separation of the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary [Barnett, p. 125 REF1]. The Executive is the administrative branch of government. It makes laws by way of delegated legislation and drafts bills. The Legislature, the law-making branch of government, is the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The Judiciary, the law-enforcing branch of government, enforce the law through their interpretation of legislation [Units 10 and 11, p.65 REF2]. Separation of power can mean three things;

An example of why the different entities should be kept separate is found in the case of McGonnell v UK (2000) 8 BHRC 56. In relation to this case, Sir Graham, the Bailiff of Guernsey, held Executive, Legislative and Judicial positions. The ECJ ruled on appeal that his role as part of the Executive was ‘capable of casting doubt on his impartiality when he subsequently determined the applicants planning appeal’. This can be compared to the Lord Chancellor who holds Legislative (Speaker of the House of Lords, presides over Legislature), Judicial (Senior Appellate Judge, sits on House of Lords’ Judicial Committee) and Executive (Minister, Place in the Cabinet) [REF4]. Another example of overlapping functions is that Cabinet members (Executive) are members of the House of Commons or Lords (Legislative) as by convention members of the Legislature always form the Government, and by delegated legislation they may be seen to wield legislative power. The Cabinet Government system could not work without this practice as it requires the support of the Legislature to put in force new bills [Harris, p 183 REF5]. The House of Lords acts as both a Legislative and Judiciary body. In practice the judicial members of the House of Lords very rarely sit on legislative matters and the same is true of the legislative members of the House of Lords and judicial cases. This shows that although they share the same institution the judicial and legislative aspect of the House of Lords do separate powers [Harris, p185 REF5]. Drewry agrees with this position, stating that “it is probably a good idea to have a Judiciary which is somewhat aloof from the rough and tumble of party politics” [Drewry, p.185 REF10]. It is clear to me that there is no distinct separation of powers in the United Kingdom, and Drewry states of this, that “words like “Legislative”, “Executive” and “Judicial” are a useful shorthand way of describing a lot of things that go in government, provided we remember that the boundaries between them are indistinct and that they are all functionally inter-related.” [Drewry, p.185 REF10]. However, I believe that the purpose of the separation of powers is not compromised as a system of checks and balances is employed in order to maintain a balance of powers. The three entities can maintain a subliminal control over one another to ensure that no one entity has too much power. [Barnett pp.139 REF1] For example, the Courts can review delegated legislation to see if it is ultra vires, thus checking the Executive. Further, the Executive appoints the judges by advising the Queen on their appointment [REF3]. The Judges can check the Legislative and the Executive through interpretation of statutes, in line with E.C. law and the Human Rights Act 1998 [REF3]. An example of this R. v. Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No.2) [1991] 1 AC 603 [REF6]. The House of Lords (Judiciary) ruled that it could suspend an Act of Parliament (Executive/Legislative) if it conflicted with E.C. law. However, a UK statute which repealed the European Community Act 1972 would probably be obeyed by the UK courts indicating that final power may well rest with the Legislative and Executive [Units 12 and 13, pp.152-153 REF7]. A further check on the powers of statutory bodies and ultimately ministers is the concept of Judicial Review. High Court judges have 3 principle legal powers called prerogative writs to control the actions of these bodies. These include,

Ministerial responsibility keeps a check on the powers of the Cabinet (Executive). Ministers have both collective responsibility in that they must be loyal to government policy whether or not they personally agree, and have individual responsibility in that they are accountable for all official acts carried out in their department, whether or not they personally sanctioned them. Finally, they are accountable to Parliament, and must answer questions put to them and resign if guilty of inappropriate conduct [Units 10 & 11 p.84 REF9]. The public and media themselves keep a check on abuse of power. The media has an investigative role that is important for bring matters involving improper conduct of the three entities to the public’s attention. The public are the voters and the government must command their confidence. In conclusion, the doctrine of the separation of powers controls abuse of power. However, as the separation in the United Kingdom is unclear, the system of checks and balances is effective in prohibiting any one entity becoming too powerful. This is especially true now with the adoption of E.C. Law as the Judiciary have more power to check the Executive/Legislature. This is true of the Lord Chancellor who holds positions in all of the entities but may now be excluded from sitting as a Law Lord when challenging the Human Rights Act as he was a member of its drafting [REF3]. I believe there is still the chance of an unbalancing of power, but that this is unlikely as the checks between departments would probably not allow it to happen, nor would the public with whom all power ultimately lies with voters. References: 1. Barnett, H. Constitutional & Administrative Law (2001, 3rd Edition) Chapter 5: The Separation of Powers, p. 125, Cavendish Publishing, London. 2. W200: Understanding Law, Manual 2 (2003) Units 10 and 11: Introduction to Constitutional Principles: A: Constitutions, p.65, Open University, Milton Keynes. 3. Bradley & Ewing, Constitutional & Administrative Law (12th Edition) Addison Wesley Longman pp.92-98 in W200: Understanding Law, Resource Book 2 (2003) Reading 4, pp.28-36, Open University, Milton Keynes. 4. McGonnell v UK (2000) 8 BHRC 56 found at www.butterworths.com and in Gordon, R. and Ward, T., Human Rights Update, Solicitors Journal, 18th February 2000 in W200: Understanding Law, Resource Book 2 (2003) Reading 5, pp.34-35, Open University, Milton Keynes. 5. Harris, P. An Introduction to Law (6th Edition, 2002), Law and the Settlement of Disputes: The English Court; the constitutional position, Butterworths, UK. 6. R. v. Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No.2) [1991] 1 AC 603 in Weatherill, S. Cases and Materials on E.C. Law pp. 729-733, Blackstone Press, London 7. W200: Understanding Law, Manual 2 (2003) Units 12 and 13 – Introduction to the European Union and EC Law: C: Parliamentary Supremacy and European Community Law, pp.152 – 153, Open University, Milton Keynes. 8. W200: Understanding Law, Manual 1 (2003) Units 5 – 7: How the English Legal System Works: F: Judicial Review, pp.212-216, Open University, Milton Keynes. 9. W200: Understanding Law, Manual 2 (2003) Units 10 and 11: Introduction to Constitutional Principles: B: The Sources of the Constitution, pp.84-85, Open University, Milton Keynes. 10. Drewry, G. Law, Justice and Politics (2nd Edition, 1981) Longman p.4 cited in Harris, P. An Introduction to Law (6th Edition, 2002), Law and the Settlement of Disputes: The English Court; the constitutional position, p.185, Butterworths, UK.

...(download the rest of the essay above)

About this essay:

If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

Essay Sauce, The doctrine of separation of powers . Available from:<https://www.essaysauce.com/law-essays/essay-the-doctrine-of-separation-of-powers/> [Accessed 03-03-23].

These Law essays have been submitted to us by students in order to help you with your studies.

* This essay may have been previously published on Essay.uk.com at an earlier date.

Essay Categories:

Privacy Overview

IMAGES

SEPARATION OF POWERS
Doctrine of Separation of powers
Separation Of Powers Example
Separation of Powers Essay
Separation of Powers Revision Notes
The Separation of Power: [Essay Example], 938 words

VIDEO

essay on will power
Differences between Federalism and Separation of Powers
Separation of Powers: A Comparison of Administrative, Legislative, and Judicial Water Regimes
Lecture-5: Theory of Separation of Powers
Public Law
Public Law

COMMENTS

Separation of Powers Under the Constitution | Constitution ...
A well-known concept derived from the text and structure of the Constitution is the doctrine of what is commonly called separation of powers. The Framers’ experience with the British monarchy informed their belief that concentrating distinct governmental powers in a single entity would subject the nation’s people to arbitrary and oppressive government action. 1 Footnote
Separation of powers | Definition & Facts | Britannica
separation of powers, division of the legislative, executive, and judicial functions of government among separate and independent bodies. Such a separation, it has been argued, limits the possibility of arbitrary excesses by government, since the sanction of all three branches is required for the making, executing, and administering of laws. The doctrine may be traced to ancient and medieval ...
The Separation of Powers Essay - LawTeacher.net
This essay aims to examine the reasons for and why it is important to have a separation of powers, to examine the United Kingdom’s constitution, assessing our somewhat unclear separation of powers, and discussing the reasons why we do not have a strict separation, taking into account the overlaps and relationships between each limb of Government …
Separation of Powers, Essay Example | essays.io
The system of separation of powers was designed to present a series of checks and balances among the various areas of political, legal, and economic power that were envisioned as being part of the American Constitutional democracy.
Essay On Separation Of Powers - 714 Words | Internet Public ...
In conclusion, the separation of powers helps control the government and prevent them from breaking the rules of the constitution and how they should govern. The Separation of powers allows for each of the branches of the government to check each other and ensure they all follow the rules and laws set by the constitution.
Separation of Powers - LawTeacher.net
The effect of separation of powers, is removing the amount of power in any groups hands, so in essence it makes it difficult for them to abuse it. I would be discussing three obvious breaches of separation of power, and whether they are beneficial or detrimental to the system.
The Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances Essay | Bartleby
The separation of power plays an important role of keeping the three branches which are legislative, executive, and judicial in the government systems equal to one another and that neither branches becomes too powerful. Each branch has its very own power and duties to serve to the people and government.
Essay: The doctrine of separation of powers - ESSAY SAUCE
In conclusion, the doctrine of the separation of powers controls abuse of power. However, as the separation in the United Kingdom is unclear, the system of checks and balances is effective in prohibiting any one entity becoming too powerful.