- RESEARCH PAPERS AND ESSAYS
- ESSAY TOPICS
- PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES
- Joseph Robinette Biden
- Donald Trump
- Barack Obama
- States Ranked by Size & Population
- States Ranked by Date
Is Animal Testing Necessary Essay
Animal testing: necessary or appropriate research subjects.
There is no unambiguous evidence that proves animal testing is essential for medical researches. In fact, the increasing evidence shows that it is actually an ineffective way to understand human physiology and others because humans are different from other animals in anatomy, genetics and metabolism. If science research field was given enough fund to do animal-free alternatives, other solutions to replace animal testing can certainly be found. In reality, Humane Research Australia (HRA) reports that many discoveries made by non-animal methods were later verified by animal experiments, which gives false credit to animal use and indirectly making people rely more on and have faith in animal testing. For example, HRA notes, “Ovarian function was demonstrated by physician Dr. Robert. T. Morris in 1895 in surgical procedures on women, yet history credits the discovery to Emil Knauer who reproduced the procedure in rabbits in
Opposing Arguments Against Animal Testing
According to my research, animals has been in used for scientific testing early as 500 B.C. Scientist use animals purposely for medical treatment, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare uses (Animal Testing, 4). It is estimated that over 26 million animals are used yearly in the U.S for scientific testing or other purpose. The reason why animals testing is so important for scientist and ultimately human race is because, animals testing allow the progress of life saving treatment for humans and animals. Second profound reason is, there no alternative means of conducting research that requires a complete living organism. The useage of animals
Animal Testing Wrong
95% of animals being used for animal testing are not covered by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). That is a high percentage of animals not protected and have a high chance of being mistreated. That is only a part of the problem when it comes to animal testing. The bigger issue is that the anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings. Their is no reason to test animals if it could mislead researchers from breakthroughs. By performing clinical trials on humans their would be better chances of finding cures and treatments.
Pro Animal Testing Cons
Although the idea of testing with animals may sound horrible, animal testing is extremely necessary to keep developing new medicines, and treatments. The benefits of animal testing outweigh the cons of hurting animals for our own wellbeing. These benefits include, many long found treatments and cures that has helped many people throughout the years. Animal testing is also the only way that scientists can properly test on. And lastly, whether many people believe it or not it also benefits animals as well.
Animal Testing Controversy
There is much controversy with regards to animal testing for medical research and there has been throughout the centuries. We can trace the issue back all the way to the 4th century when we have the first record of animal experimentation, Aristotle dissecting animals for study. In the 1600s, scientists began using animals as a way to explore the human body which led to many advancements in the medical field. Such advancements include Emil von Bering finding a cure for diphtheria toxin for guinea pigs; further research allowed him to produce a diphtheria vaccine for humans (Bright).In spite of these many medical achievements brought on through the use of animal testing, there are still those that argue the practice is not justifiable and should
Animal Testing Is Cruel And Inhumane
Throughout thousands of years, animal testing has been proven to be beneficial for the human race. While it has done a wonderful job for us, it has only injured, killed and put an enormous amount of pain on animals. The exact number of animals used in research yearly is unknown, due to official government statistics not including mice, rats, birds, fish, or other animals used for testing: some estimates put the total number to be 26 million. The use of animals for scientific research is cruel and inhumane, while both humans and animals share similar traits, they are both made up of completely different genes making them poor test subjects to begin with and may mislead or cause side effects for both parties.
Why Animal Testing Is Necessary
People would argue that animal testing is essential to find cures for illness. Animal testing has helped find, develop cures and treatments. Since in the past 100 years of testing it has resulted in many successes. Experimentation in dogs helped lead to the discovery of insulin, but the dog’s pancreas were removed as a result. Laboratory research on animals has helped researchers have a better understanding on treating illnesses such as breast cancer, brain injury, leukemia, malaria, and much more (ProCon.org). What else is the best option to test a hypothesis on other than a person. The best way to test a hypothesis is on a living organism since humans and animals both have very integrated bodies. Since testing, a drug requires a body to circulate blood throughout the body to get the full effect to be able to see the full potential of the side effects, which may include blindness, which cannot be determined on just tissue. Human and animal DNA is very similar to mice, mice are 98% genetically similar to humans and they all have the same set of organs as a human. Animals are the best option when ethical reasons prevent researchers from using human subjects which most of the time the experiments involve genetic manipulation (ProCon.org). Not only do people benefit from these
Importance Of Animal Testing In Human Life
Throughout history, many diseases have plagued humanity. Luckily, early scientists implemented an experimental method known as animal testing. “Animal testing allows for the creation of vaccines and as a result provides many benefits to humans” (Sun 84). This approach would allow researchers to test possible cures on animals before administering them to humans. This technique protects people from the possible fatal side effects. This process would become highly sought after as it helped in providing several medications that would control, prevent or cure many diseases. One might suggest that animal testing is cruel or unjust, but it is precisely the opposite. Animal testing must continue due to many associated
Why Is Animal Testing Bad
Is animal testing a good thing for us to be doing? One good thing that comes from animal testing is as the world evolves the medicine also evolves with it. This testing helps us find new curses. Here is some reasons why it has its down fall. The animals that go through these testing are killed and hold in cavity. We should not be testing on animals at all. There are other ways to test new products and the evolution in the medicine industry. We should protect the wildlife rather than test on them.
Should Animal Testing Be Illegal Essay
Animals have similar anatomy to humans, but it is still vastly different. What works on an animal could have a totally different effect on humans. For example, according to the FDA, Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around 320,000 heart attacks and strokes and 140,000 deaths worldwide. This proves that medical testing on animals isn’t necessarily beneficial considering the physiological differences between man and animal. But that’s not the only case of medical testing gone wrong. According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information, a clinical trial of Hepatitis B drug fialuridine had to be stopped because it caused severe liver damage in seven patients, five of whom died. It had been tested on animals first. The multiple claims of medicine tested on animals bringing harm to the very people it was designed to help shows that testing on animals poses a threat to not just animals, but humans as well. It 's a moot point to bring suffering to a living being if the reasoning behind the harm is
Benefits Of Animal Testing
Animal testing has been involved in medical research for a long time, resulting in an improvement of human health. The benefits of animal testing for medical research outweigh the drawbacks. Although opponents argue that the drawbacks of animal testing outweigh the benefits because animal testing is cruel, in actuality, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks because it saves human lives and is an affordable option.
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing On Animals
Animals are being used for personal needs and used against their will so morally this seems wrong. There has been many side effects to testing that have hurt mankind so there are very good reasons to do away with animal testing.
Persuasive Essay: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed?
Animal testing has been a controversial issue for a long time now.Whether or not animal testing is humane or not, both sides of the argument are hard to choose from . On one hand you have the possibility of curing diseases, saving lives, and helping the human race. On the other hand you have the lives of many innocent animals who are being injected, probed, caged and mistreated for just facts.Whether this is morally right or wrong, I will present both sides of the argument as well as my opinion.
Essay On Why Animal Testing Is Necessary
Is animal testing necessary?. Should we ban expending animals in medical research or not?. More than 26 million animals are used in different countries like the United States and Canada. Animal testing may by defining as the use of animals in experiments and research that seeks to control the variable that impacts the behavior or biological system under study. Using large number of animals is mainly meant to find treatments and cure for certain diseases. Moreover, animals are used to develop medical treatments, check the safety of any products before people can use it and in science education. Therefore, without using animals in the medical and scientific studies the products and all the medicine would be based on theory only. Furthermore, people will use something that may cause serious damages to them. Animal testing has provided many
Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing
Imagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral. However, both sides agree that it would be beneficial to reduce animal suffering by finding alternatives to this practice.
More about Is Animal Testing Necessary Essay
The Benefits of Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation
Animal rights are held entirely too high in regard. Many activist do not realize the benefits of testing on animals. They claim that it is "unethical" or "cruel" to perform experiments on such creatures. The truth is, the world as a whole has advanced tremendously in the past century due to animal experimentation. We are affected every day by at least one thing that has been influenced by animal testing. Many of the things we take for granted would not exist if it were not for experimenting with animals. The medicine that we need, the education that we receive, and the products that we use are just a few of the benefits that these animals bring to us. We should look at animals, not as poor defenseless creatures that are subject to cruel experiments, but as heroes that have improved almost every aspect of our life in todays society. In contrast, opponents to animal testing believe that animals have a right to live as a human being. The rights of animals are even claimed in the "Universal Declaration of the Rights of Animals" proposed by the International League of the Rights of Animals. There are also opposers who believe that it is wrong to hurt any living creature. People such as Michael Fox, a professor at Queen's University of Kingston Ontario, has based his theory of the unjustification of animal experimentation on "the principle of maleficence." This principle states that it is simply wrong to harm creatures that do not want to hurt you. The problem with this statement is that we value the life of an animal lower than a human life. Some experiments can only be done on animals. For example, we could not subject a human to a potential toxin or other harmful chemicals. Some other experiments measure life expectancy and would... ... middle of paper ... ...ause the actual virus is introduced into the blood stream. However, in the end the death of the animal is justified by the lives of the humans it saves. There is always a price to pay for the benefit for mankind. We should care for all animals living on this planet. However, the sacrifice of animals for the benefit of mankind surpasses all doubt whether or not animal experimentation is ethical. They have helped us more than we can ever imagine. Thanks to animals, we have advanced in all areas of living. Our medical standards are higher and our education is better. Animal testing has made available more products and improved technology. Although from the animals' perspective it might seem harsh and inhumane, from the scientist's point of view, one can clearly see that these animals are heroes that have helped the human race survive and advance in our world today.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that animal rights are held too high in regard. many activists do not realize the benefits of testing on animals.
- Explains that opponents to animal testing believe that animals have a right to live as humans. michael fox's theory of the unjustification of animal experimentation is based on "the principle of maleficence."
- Explains that opponents have suggested that technology can substitute for the real thing. however, these methods are not yet as sophisticated as they need to be.
- Explains that animal rights activists believe cruel things are being done to the animals used for testing. however, there are organizations that restrict and create lab procedures and conditions in which to work with animals.
- Explains that the medical field has been greatly impacted by the use of animals, such as f. g. banting and j.j r. macleod's vivisection.
- Explains that animal testing has brought an innumerable number of advances to medicine, including the treatment of rabies and anthrax.
- Explains how animals have been used in the study of coronary artery disease, including dogs, cats, primates, and even humans.
- Explains how jonas salk created the polio vaccine and effectively cured and prevented millions of victims around the world.
- Explains that vivisections wiped out polio, smallpox, flu vaccinations, and antibiotics. animals will be needed to test newer and more advanced viruses that can cause deadly diseases.
- Explains that the dissection of an animal is a great learning tool because it provides concrete, hands-on learning experiences with anatomy.
- Explains that without compulsory dissections, real medical knowledge or understanding is impossible. animals cannot be taken out of the wild and used in an experiment.
- Explains that animal experimentation has led to many advances in veterinary practice and produced vaccines for rabies, lyme disease, and feline leukemia.
- Explains that the study of psychology has been directly affected by vivisections. opponents of the use of animals in psychological experiments envision animals undergoing electrolysis, or shock therapy, and convulsing.
- Explains that behavioral and psychological research has helped in many areas, including alzheimer's disease, communication with the mentally retarded, early detections of eye impairments in children, and control of chronic anxiety.
- Explains that testing on animals has led to numerous products such as vaccines, toxoids and antitoxins. at the expense of losing animals, scientists are saving millions of people that use the products.
- Explains the importance of thyroxine from animal experimentation. hypothyroidism, or myxedema, occurs when the thyroid gland is deprived of the hormone.
- Explains that the most important product discovered with the use of animals in experimentation was penicillin, discovered in 1928 by a scottish biologist named alexander fleming.
- Explains that vaccines for many diseases, such as small pox and measles, have been made possible by animal testing.
- Opines that the sacrifice of animals for the benefit of mankind surpasses doubt whether or not animal experimentation is ethical. they have helped us advance in all areas of living.
- argumentative
- explanatory
- Opines that animal testing should be banned or at the bare minimum reduced by laws that are enforced.
- Explains that although many animals share dna with humans, animal test results are highly unreliable — anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and humans make them poor models for humans.
- Explains that only 1.16% of human illnesses can be found in animals, which reduces the reliability and practicality of animal testing.
- Argues that animal testing should be banned due to the cruel environments the animals have to face. the animal welfare act does not protect animals used in testing.
- Explains that animal testing is not the only way to see what will and won't harm humans. other alternatives include computer programs, synthetic skin, growing cells on petri dishes, and microfluidic chips.
- Concludes that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. millions of animals' lives are lost each year, and the basic needs of the animals used in these experiments are not met.
- Explains that animal experimentation is a widely debated topic in the united states. the pro-research community believes that animals are morally and ethically justified.
- Explains that the philosophy of the animal rights movement asserts that non-human creatures are entitled to the same rights as humans and that man has no place or authority to use them as our means or modes of survival.
- Argues that the application of the animal welfarist's philosophy of 'the three rs' in testing practices would serve as a compromise between animal rights and animal research factions.
- Explains that experiments are used to test the effects of man's diseases, medicines, and products on animals in laboratory to enhance human knowledge of their own physical and physiological workings.
- Argues that animal experimentation is justified by the theory that animals cannot be placed on the moral level of humans.
- Explains that animal-rights activists believe that animals feel pain and suffering as humans do and that all creatures, regardless of moral-reasoning capability, are entitled to freedom of torture and pain.
- Argues that the practice of animal welfare in experimentation could be used to compromise research versus animal rights philosophies.
- Illustrates the trend of giving researchers more flexibility in lab practices where the welfare of the animal can be placed at a higher priority.
- Opines that if research practices a more refined approach to testing, it is possible that the welfare of animals is taken into greater consideration. reduction, being seen as the second 'r', is an important factor in the animal welfare movement.
- States that test subject substitutes such as artificial tissues can not serve as a suitable replacement to live organisms.
- Analyzes how the debate of animal testing has polarized american culture in values of how animals should be viewed and treated in society.
- Explains that the animals rights philosophy asserts that humans, as a part of nature, have no right to use animals solely for the benefit of their species, citing the practice as unethical and immoral.
- Explains that many forms of animal cruelty are not widely known by the majority of the human population, including animal testing, animal abuse, fur farming, vivisection, puppy mills, and many more.
- Opines that animal testing should be illegal because it is inhumane, unethical, and results cannot always be accurately compared to the results that would come from human beings.
- Opines that animal testing is a moral dilemma that each person must come to terms with on their own.
- Explains that animals are crammed into filthy sheds and beaten and/or branded into doing what their owners want them to do at slaughterhouses.
- Describes how the cows at the slaughterhouse peta did research on were treated no better. they were tied to poles, had their horns cut off, and were repeatedly branded.
- Explains that dog fighting is a sadistic contest in which two dogs that are specifically bred, conditioned, and trained to fight each other for the spectators' entertainment and gambling.
- Explains that vivisection and fur farming are closely related cruel actions that are performed for the benefit of humans. fur farms are dismal, filthy places where thousands of animals are kept in wire cages for their entire lives.
- Explains that puppy mills are a place where an abundance of dogs are sold with the thought of profit above the safety and well-being of the dogs.
- Opines that animal cruelty needs to be stopped because it is inhumane, unjust, and there is no need for it.
- Argues that animal experimentation is unnecessarily cruel and inaccurate proving that it is neither beneficial nor ethical to perform. alternatives to animal testing have been developed and presented throughout the years but scientists are stubborn and stuck in their ways.
- Explains that animal rights activists and their cause can be traced back to the antivivisection campaigns of the 1900s.
- Argues that some people defend experimentation on animals because they believe that they are not capable of experiencing the same amount of pain as humans.
- Argues that a large organization doesn't need to be involved in animal abuse and experimentation because individuals are just as effective as an organization like peta.
- Opines that animal experimentation is not as good as it may seem to humans because we are not feeling it. it is cruel to animals to experience this. many experts say is the only way to make new medicine, but you have to think about the animal.
- Explains that animal experimentation is the infliction of pain onto animals to see their reaction. humans use animals because they don't want to experience this ourselves.
- Explains that a rabbit has the exact same reaction as humans, which could be wasting an animal's life and potentially disabling it for its life.
- Explains that drugs that pass for animals will not necessarily be safe for humans. the 1950s sleeping pill thalidomide was tested on animals prior to its commercial release.
- Explains that people go against animal testing because animals can feel pain just like us. it's racist to animals, and discriminates them as less than human.
- Explains that scientists aren't using humans on experiments because they're inhuman, which is different from using animals.
- Opines that animal testing is inhuman and not cheap. long-term experiments will increase the cost of animal care, and it's not just a one-hour experiment.
- Opines that there is no proof that animals are needed for anything. medical research has shown that we are far enough in technology to use alternate subjects to test on other than animals and humans.
- Explains that most animals, once in captivity, are no just let go after the experiments. they are killed after being tested, which is what animal rights activists are fighting to stop.
- Opines that animal testing has many pros and cons, including a cure for diabetes. if we had not tested on animals, how would we have found insulin to help people live longer?
- Explains that it's harder to find the cure for a sickness if you can't test on something that can carry it, and has the same effects as humans.
- Explains that animals share 99% of genes that humans have, so they are worthy test subjects. without animals, we will probably never advance in technologies today.
- Explains that animal testing benefits humans for cures and technologies, but it also helps animals. millions of animals could have died if it weren't for animal tests.
- Explains that animal testing is regulated, and there are laws to protect the animals from unnecessary harm. all proposals to testing on animals must be approved by iacuc.
- Opines that if animals had rights, all humans would be forced to become vegetarians, and all hunting in any country that gives them rights.
- Opines that if animal testing was outlawed, everyone would have to stop eating animals.
- Explains that many religions allow animal testing to specific animals if not most of them. the bible states that humans have more power over animals.
- Opines that their opinion on animal experimentation is split between the two answers. there are many factors that split their decision on which would be more beneficial to humankind.
- Opines that animal experimentation is not the best thing for animals, and can be cruel in many ways.
- Opines that animal experimentation has brought us so far, and without it, we would not be where we are today.
- Explains why people still disavow animal testing being unsuitable, stating that animals are living creatures and deserve the same treatment as humans.
- Explains that animal testing is the procedure that is being performed on living animals for the purpose of research. chemicals, makeup and food additives are just a small list of what the animals are put through.
- Opines that we are testing on animals, even though it is unreliable. we have forced animals into laboratories, picked at their skin and put them in excruciating physical pain and psychological distress.
- Explains that millions of animals are locked in small cages without the proper care they need to survive. this can cause animals to behave in strange ways due to pain, sterility, boredom, and stress.
- Explains that 5 to 25 % of all drugs that come from animal tests that pass and then are later found to be bad are thrown away. why are we putting animals through this pain and risking their lives?
- Opines that animal testing is unscientific, unable to accurately apply the results from an animal to humans, and that it's time to refocus and adapt new methodologies to understand disease biology in humans.
- Recommends using vitro testing, computer modeling, and research with human volunteers to test substances on animals rather than animals.
- Opines that animal testing will never be acceptable. animals in laboratories are deprived of everything that is natural to them, they are socially isolated and psychological traumatized.
- Opines that science has a responsibility to use animals to keep looking for cures for all the horrible diseases that people suffer.
- Opines that animal testing is a topic of major interest and majorly problematic throughout the united states today.
- Explains that animals are force-fed experimental chemicals that sicken and kill them, while soldiers chop off lamb legs with axes without even providing the lamb with painkillers.
- Opines that animal testing is a major issue as it drifts away from basic principles of advancement into cruel and unusual punishment that can be avoided.
- Suggests ways to end animal testing cruelty, such as asking the food and drug administration to accept superior non-animal methods.
- Opines that if these problems aren't addressed, animal cruelty will expand and america's most innocent creatures will have to pay the price.
- Urges teachers to use alternative methods to dissect animals, use animals that died at their own will not from cruel testing, and make a change today.
- Urges people to take a stand in animal cruelty and defend the animals of the world.
- Explains that animal testing by humans has received much attention over the years and the issue has often been debated.
- Argues that killing or hurting any living being is morally wrong, since man's basic instinct is to protect himself and all others from harm. an animal, no matter how small or unimportant, should be treated with respect and no one has the right to decide whether it should live or die.
- Opines that if humans were used for testing, they would be told of the consequences and have the right to refuse, but an animal is not able to say yes or no and has no choice about the testing.
- Explains how the johns hopkins center for alternatives to animal testing (caat) has worked with scientists since 1981 to find new methods to replace the use of laboratory animals in experiments.
- Argues that killing animals for research is morally and ethically wrong, since people can exist on a vegan diet without harm.
- Explains alistair currie is policy adviser for people for the ethical treatment of animals (peta).
- Explains clemmitt, marcia, "animal rights." cq researcher, n.p., 10 jan. 2010.
- Explains that animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit, but many people forget the great numbers of animals that have suffered serious harm during the process.
- Argues that animal testing is wrong and that it should not be allowed, since there is a substitution, on the account of testing on animals.
- Explains that penicillin is lethal to guinea pigs, deactivates the blood system of rabbits and is deadly to cats. scientists are pushing for more experiments regardless of the cost to the animal's life.
- Argues that animals suffering in experimentation labs are just and cruel to animals. it is wrong to harm an innocent animal of any wrong doing, when the animal doesn't know right from wrong
- Explains that charles fried claims physical harm as an impingement upon the body which either causes pain or impairs functioning. many animals experience pain, and sometimes death, during lab experiments.
- Defines vivisection as an invasive experiment performed on an animal for the purpose of scientific research, product testing or education.
- Opines that animal experiments are wrong because of the repulsive pain of electrodes planted in chimps' brains, and the tortured raccoon's death.
- Explains that more than five billion dollars of federal tax revenue are spent annually on animal research. animals, like the rest of nature, were understood not to have any sort of value except to bring enjoyment to lives.
- Explains that scientists test products on animals to see if they are safe. many companies use tests such as the draize test and the ld-50.
- Explains that draize test is used to measure the harmfulness of chemicals found in household products and cosmetics, by observing the damage they cause to the eyes and skin of animals.
- Explains that the lethal dose 50 test kills half of the test group. the animals that didn't die are killed.
- Explains that even with testing that the animal goes through, a reliable prediction is impossible to ascertain. pain is not the only side effect of experiments; psychological effects occur too.
- Opines that there should be ways to undo experiments that do not involve animals. if animal testing were to stop overall, would the research end?
- Explains that with in vitro (test tube) technologies, scientists can do chemical assay tests, tissue culture systems, cell and organ cultures, cloned human skin cells, mathematical models, and human volunteers.
- Opines that all wild animals have the right to liberty in their natural environment, whether land, air, or water, and should be allowed to procreate. depravation of freedom is an infringement of an animals right.
- Opines that animals were on this land before humans, so they have a right to be treated equally. if scientists keep on experimenting with animals, they may go extinct.
- Explains that animal experimentation is not justified. animal rights:opposing viewpoints. leone,bruno, san diego, ca. greenhouse press.
Related Topics
- Animal Liberation Front
Argumentative Essay Animal Testing
Argumentative Essay: The Ethics Of Testing On Animals
tested on multiple times? Animal testing is something we as people cant stop it from happening. Animals are tested to make up and being put through toucher day by day. Sure it could help cure disease for humans, but the last time I checked animals aren’t humans. Testing on an animal is unethical if you hate hunters for harming them down and killing them. What makes you any better than them when you use make-up that was tested on an animals. You know that animals are contained in harsh conditions, enduring suffering, and locked up in a cage for years. Does using animals as lab rats for good, shows that you sill have any humanity inside of you. On the other hand it helps scientists find cures for disease's and it's the only way that people don't get hurt. Finally to begin with, harming animals for testing drugs is unethical for human to do. Even…
- Animal Testing Argumentative Essay
Animal testing has greatly advanced Human health. Without animal testing, diseases like kidney transplants, cervical disease would not have been advanced in the way that it has. Advancements in medicine, insulin and numerous other drugs have been made achievable through animal testing. Animal testing will always continue to advance medical research. In order to produce new types of drugs, scientists must be able to test them out on animals. Scientists have established that various animals have…
Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing
pg. 1 Animal Testing Throughout history, animals have been considered one of the primary sources in human lives. They can be beneficial for the human such as using their skins for different purposes, for example manufacturing furniture, clothes, etc. As they can benefit as some of them are eatable by humans, while others people use animals as pets in their homes. However, the same creatures that had a massive impact on our livers are being torched, suffered and harmed. In the hands of…
Argumentative Essay. Should animals be used for research? Using animals for testing is extremely cruel, animals deserve rights, and it should be illegal. They don’t deserve to be lab rats, to be tested on whenever people feel the need. The use of animals for testing should be illegal. Why is animal testing cruel? What if you were in a dark hole with no say in anything you do, and you were experimented on whenever the need was felt? That wouldn’t be well at all. Animals are often shocked,…
Argumentative Essay: The Benefits Of Animal Testing
Few examples exist that truly show how cruel people can be, and animal testing is high on the list. Imagine a beloved animal, caged in stainless steel, shaking, being analyzed for the effects of a new ingredient in a beauty product. Millions are drawn to protest the tests conducted for vanity, and some countries have already placed laws in action to ban the practice. The fight continues in the U.S. for the welfare of animals that are still undergoing vile tests so that people can have cosmetic…
Argumentative Essay On Animal Product Testing
Do you know the damaging effects animal product testing has on animals? How would you feel if someone told you that your own pet had to go through animal product testing? There are over 25 million of lab animals that go through animal product testing in a year and it is merely atrocious to know what animals have to undergo. Although animal product testing is one of the main way scientists test products, animal product testing is inhumane, and should come to an end. Animals are treated…
Argumentative Essay: The Ethics Of Animal Testing
thousands of animals for our own heartless wants. Animal Testing has been a highly debated and ongoing topic for many years. The dangers of using animals to test products being made for human uses is a high risk. Approximately 225 million animals are used for testing every year. Billions have been killed in the process. ("Questions and Answers About Biomedical Research.”) How can this be allowed? Isn’t it cruel to use animals to…
Imagine your family pet being enclosed in a small, cold, and dirty cage for days, weeks, or even months on end, only being taken out to be subjected to painful experiments without any anesthetic, as well as the possibility of developing life threatening diseases and injuries. Too many animals experience this on a regular basis around the globe - in fact, nearly 25 million animals will be used as test subjects annually. Animal testing is a horrible occurrence, one that brings suffering to even…
Animals squeal with their hearts beating fast. They’re held down by strong arms as a needle is injected into them. The next breath they take might be their last. The injection messes with their brain. Their body becomes mutated. The poor innocent creatures have become test subjects. The only way they can keep living is if the scientist creates some serum to save it. But it doesn’t matter, the animal has already changed, it will never be itself again. Isn’t obvious? Animal testing is…
ethical. Wether it is or isn't, most people believe that some form of cost-benift test should be performed to determine if the action is right. The animals go through pain, distress and even death, where the benefits are the collection of new knowledge or the development of new medical therapies. Over more than 1.4 million animals are used each year.The testing can date all they way back to ancient times of the Greeks and Romans. A physician who dissects animals to obtain knowledge. Supporters…
Related Topics:
- Animal Liberation Front
- Animal rights
- Animal testing
- British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection
- Medical research
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
- Testing cosmetics on animals
- The Animals
Popular Topics:
- Example of Argumentative Essay
- Essay on Tsunami
- Genetic Engineering Essay
- Malcolm X Essay
- Gun Control Persuasive Essay
- An Inspector Calls Essay
- My Strength and Weakness Essay
- Essay About Baby
- Relationship Between Teacher and Student Essay
- The Great Gatsby American Dream Essay
- Addiction Essay
- Persuasive Essay on Gun Control
- Self Evaluation Essay
- A Good Teacher Essay
- Biography Essay
- You Are What You Eat Essay
- Wall Street Crash 1929 Essays
- Apartheid Essay
- Substance Abuse Essay
- Descriptive Essay About Nature
- Essay on Commitment
- Communism in Russia 1900 to 1940 Essay
- Prejudice Essay
- Vandalism Essay Students
Ready To Get Started?
- Create Flashcards
- Mobile apps
- Accessibility
- Cookie Settings
The Essay Writing Experts UK Essay Experts
Disclaimer: This is an example of a student written essay. Click here for sample essays written by our professional writers.
View full disclaimer
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKEssays.com.
Arguments For and Against Animal Testing in the US
Reference this
1.0 Introduction
If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!
2.1 Animal testing helps in the development of drugs and treatments.
2.2 the importance of human lives is given priority over animal lives..
Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.
2.3 Animal testing is helpful for studying the effects of substances.
3.0 recommendation, 4.0 conclusion, cite this work.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related Services
Essay Writing Service
- Dissertation Writing Service
- Assignment Writing Service
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please:
Our academic writing and marking services can help you!
- Find out more about our Essay Writing Service
- Undergraduate 2:2
- 7 day delivery
- Marking Service
- Samples of our Service
- Full Service Portfolio
Related Lectures
Study for free with our range of university lectures!
- All Available Lectures
Freelance Writing Jobs
Looking for a flexible role? Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher?
Study Resources
Free resources to assist you with your university studies!
- Dissertation Resources at UKDiss.com
- How to Write an Essay
- Essay Buyers Guide
- Referencing Tools
- Essay Writing Guides
- Masters Writing Guides
Search Support Articles
*You can also browse our support articles here >
Change Region / Country
Here you can choose which regional hub you wish to view, providing you with the most relevant information we have for your specific region. If your specific country is not listed, please select the UK version of the site, as this is best suited to international visitors.
United Kingdom
United States
United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
The Pros of Animal Testing Essay
- 17 Works Cited
The Cons of Animal Testing Essay
- 7 Works Cited
At this moment, millions of animals know cold cages in laboratories as home, but why? Some of these animals are subjects for medical research purposes, while others are used out of pure curiosity and to test different products. Majority of these animals are used in painful experiments and are left in agony. While many of them die, a few animals survive, but these unfortunate ones wish they could be put out of their misery as well. Although scientists have resources they could use to lower the pain each animal endures and even alternatives of their test subjects, millions of innocent creatures are still suffering. The fact that animals are still used when animal experimentation is avoidable and not necessary makes animal testing unethical.
Pro Animal Testing Essay
History provides ample proof on the benefits of animal testing. Experimentation on animals has been an efficient practice that has been in use since 500 B.C.E. Although some select animals may suffer pain, their pain is the price paid for millions of lives being saved. Without animal testing, many cures and vaccines would not exist today, thereby leading to the loss of many human lives. The suffering of animals can be justified due to the fact that an animal’s suffering prevents the suffering of humans. Animals should be used for scientific and medical research because the contributions they provide to the world lead to life saving cures, they are the only test specimens for humans, and they provide the most effective results.
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
There are over 26 million different types of animal being tested on for research each year in the United States. Animals are used for testing every year for human research. Different animals go through serious pain, in order for humans to facilitate growth in different fields of study. Many animals are used in order to study diseases and potential cures for the diseases. New research chemicals are tested on animals with similar structures to humans, to see if the medicine can help with certain diseases. Tons of scientific advancement has taken place because of animal testing. Without animal testing, many diseases would still exist, without a safe way to test for potential cures. The issue at hand is the type of treatment that animals have to endure because of the different testing methods. They are treated very poorly, go through intense suffering, and normally have very poor living conditions. A pro to animal testing is that many cures and different medicines have been developed through animal testing. Without animal testing, many diseases would still exist without cures. Secondly, animals have a much shorter life span than humans do, so scientists can study the results through the whole life span of the animal. With humans, it is hard to do a full test because we have such high lifespans, while animals tend to live a lot less longer. Thirdly, many animals have been saved because of animal testing. Many diseases animals deal with now have vaccines and cures, as a result of animal testing. Without it, many animals would have rabies or other types of virus that can be detrimental to the animal’s health. On the contrary, a con to animal testing would be the pain many animals go through as a result of the testing. The tests are experimental, so we don’t know exactly what the chemical drug will do to the animal. Many cases have turned bad and many animals have died as a result, or gone through extensive pain. Next, there are many alternative methods of experimental testing that doesn’t require animals. As a result, why are we still using animals for testing when there are other ways to do it. Finally, animals are different from humans, so they make poor testing subjects. We can’t know for sure how the research
Animal Experimentation Is Animal Cruelty
It is estimated that each year over 100 million animals in the United States are used for animal testing (ProCon.org, 2017). This is unlikely an underestimate as it is impossible to receive a correct count worldwide. Thousands of animals are to be euthanized from the complications they endure from testing. Animals are used to test scientific developments and commercial products. New medical and non-medical experiments are tested on animals to verify the harmfulness of new medications or the safety of a product that will be used on humans. Although the importance of animal testing brings more medical advancement over the years using fewer humans in experiments, it is still an expensive way of researching inaccurate results and at the same time, it is a practice of animal cruelty.
“Animals have been used repeatedly throughout the history of biomedical research.” (Hajar) As early as 384-258 BC by early greek physician scientists Aristotle and Erasistratus who would perform experiments on living animals. Galen (129-199/217 AD), a Greek physician of Rome was one of the greatest in the history of medicine. With some experiments made on animals he was able to advance our understanding of the anatomical structure, physiology, pathology and pharmacology. Ibn Zuhr, an Arab physician in the twelfth century Moorish Spain brought upon the idea of animal testing as a way to practice surgical procedures on animals before using any kinds of methods on humans. As history shows, man has endured and overcome many diseases and illnesses. These diseases killed many people and caused many to suffer. Most have been cured due to man’s medical research. Tests done on animals have improved the lives of many humans who would have suffered themselves. Scientists, Doctors and other
William Hazlitt once said, “When a thing ceases to be a subject of controversy, it ceases to be a subject of interest.” Animal testing has been a part of society for many years however, the debates of the ethics of animal testing have risen in the past years. People argue that it is unethical to treat animals in such a manner. Others say that it is essential to medical advancements. Animal testing has both drawbacks and benefits.
Animals in animal research and testing alike receive the highest standards of care, enforced by the law. Every animal research center worldwide give animals playtime, food, water, exercise, and make sure they’re loved and healthy. Also, all facilities involved with animals have a set of rules to follow called “the 3 R’s” replace testing on animals when possible, reduce number of animals in testing to a minimum, and refine pain received by animals to a minimum. Animal researchers even use painkillers and analgesia on animals to reduce pain. Animal testing is not
Unethical Animal Testing
Within laboratory walls, the worst forms of institutionalized animal abuse is conducted. This abuse and torture is also known as animal testing and is primarily done with the expectation of find a cure to various illnesses. Scientists use this harsh research to gain control over behavior or biological systems. During the experiments helpless animals are exploited and endure great suffering. These conditions along with the feelings of the animals are unacknowledged in the name of medical research. The use of animals in medical research is essentially legal abuse. Animal testing for medical research should be made illegal because it is unethical, unreliable, and archaic.
Do you like being pricked and prodded? How about having body parts removed and put on a friend? In this paper, I plan to prove that animal testing and experimentation is useless, by explaining that major medical advances were not discovered because of animal testing, animals hardly act as good models for the human body, and that testing deprives animals of their natural function. Many animals are wrongly killed daily because of animal testing and experimentation. Major medical advances were not discovered because of animal testing. There is absolutely no use in animal testing if it hasn't done anything for humans. “Experiments with mice and rats failed to turn up any connections between cancer and smoking. Epidemiological studies, not animal experiments, found links between heart disease and cholesterol” (Berlatsky). Many diseases
Despite controversy over animal testing, according to statistics conducted by the Foundation for Biomedical Research, roughly 95% of all lab animals are some strain of mouse or rat. () Scientific researchers rely on mice and rats for several reasons, one being convenience. Rodents are small, easily housed and maintained, and adapt well to new surroundings. They also reproduce quickly and have a short lifespan of two to three years, allowing several generations to be observed in a relatively short period of time. Another reason laboratories use rats is in order to obtain genetic purity and consistency; rodents raised for animal testing can be bred so that they are almost genetically identical to prevent any bias in experimental results (Iannaccone & Jacob, 2009). What makes rats most
Proponents of animal testing: say that animal testing is a life-saving and there is no alternative method of research also that strict regulations will help the abuse of animals in the laboratories. The California Biomedical Research Association claims that every breakthrough medical research in the last hundred years is a direct result of the use of animals. Franklin D. Roosevelt, the 32nd President of the United States, was diagnosed with polio in 1921. With the animal testing researchers have reduced the global occurrence form 350,000 cases in 1988 to 27 cases in 2016.
Pros And Cons Of Pro Animal Testing Essay
A contrary explanation to how alternatives will work is that they are, in fact, reliable and accurate. The Pro animal testing advocates claim that the alternatives are not at all ready for use. Consequently, this makes many turn away from the possibilities. While alternatives are still new, they have proven their usefulness, and some companies such as L’Oréal took advantage of this new approach by using donated tissues instead of animals for testing. Further, “Cross disciplinary innovative technologies have saved over 25 million animals” (Ericson 1). It would be untruthful to say that the alternatives have not shown the ability to function. However, some are still skeptical that alternatives will "kick out" animal testing completely. Consider
Summary Of Animal Testing
This act was created to regulate the treatment of animals in research. According to the USDA, the Animal Welfare Act requires that each research facility must contain an International Animal Committee as a representative of the public’s concerns regarding animal rights and treatment. The committee must consist of at least three members, including a veterinarian and one in which knows nothing of the institution. The AWA has high housing standards for all research animals, such as access to food and water, enclosure size, and temperature of the room. To keep all in order, there must be regular inspections by veterinarians. Any and all propositions to use animals for research must be pre-approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. It is enforced that all treatment and interactions with animals must be humane. All research animals are cared for by veterinarians, husbandry specialists, and animal health technicians to ensure their well-being and safety, as well as more accurate research. Nature Genetics states that stressed and crowded animals do not produce reliable research results, and many observable characteristics are only accessible in at ease animals with an enhanced environment in which to live. It is in the best interests of the
Pros And Cons Of Abolish Animal Testing Essay
In 2010 Minnesota used 2,073, New jersey used 6,077 dogs, and Massachusetts used 7,458 primates. 95% of animals that are used in experiments is not protected by the animal welfare act. The welfare act does not cover rats, fish, mice, and birds which comprise around 95% of animals in research. The 25 million animals, not covered by AWA are especially vulnerable to being abused and missed treated. People that are against animal testing should stand up and protest for the rights to abolish animal testing.
Essay on Pros and Cons of Animal Testing
- 8 Works Cited
Animal testing has become a wide contribution in medical field in order to find new treatment, developing new medicines and improving the existing ones as well as testing the safety and effectiveness of new medicines. Some medicines development is depending on animal research, for instances, vaccines and insulin for diabetes and kidney transplants. However, there are many diseases that their cures are still undiscovered yet and one of them is AIDS (Tanir, 2012). Frankie L. Trull once said in his article of Animal Test Research Has Saved Many Human Lives, “[…] fight against cancer has seen 24 significant biomedical advances in the past 30 years. None of them could have occurred without animal research.” Therefore, this
Related Topics
- Animal testing
- Animal rights
- Huntingdon Life Sciences
- Albert Sabin
- Testing cosmetics on animals
Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Animal Testing — Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing: The Conflicting Debate
Pros and Cons of Animal Testing: The Conflicting Debate
- Subject: Social Issues
- Essay Topic: Animal Testing
- Words: 1345
- Published: 16 December 2021
- Downloads: 65
Reference List:
- procon.org. (2019) Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? Pros and Cons of Controversial Issues. Available from https://animal-testing.procon.org [accessed 11 November 2019].
- California Biomedical Research Association. CBRA Fact Sheet: Why Are Animals Necessary in Biomedical Research? California Biomedical Research Association. Available from https://ca-biomed.org/CSBR/pdf/fs-whynecessary.pdf [accessed 11 November 2019].
- World Health Organisation, (2019) Poliomyelitis. World Health Organisation. Available from https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/poliomyelitis [accessed 11 November 2019].
- Bass, P (2013), Email to ProCon.org.
- Global Polio Eradication Initiative, (2017) Polio This Week. Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Available from http://polioeradication.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/polio-eradication-gpei-annual-report-2017-DRAFT.pdf [accessed 11 November 2019].
- animalresearch.info (2014) Diseases & Research. Animal research.info. Available from http://www.animalresearch.info/en/medical-advances/diseases-research/ [accessed on 11 November 2019].
- Fisher, E., (2013) Why We Should Accept Animal Testing. HuffPost. Available from https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/professor-elizabeth-fisher/why-we-should-accept-anim_b_3608923.html? [accessed 11 November 2019].
- Speaking of Research, (2013). Do “Alternatives” Exist? Speaking of Research. Available from https://speakingofresearch.com/extremism-undone/alternatives/ [accessed 12 November 2019].
- American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. Animal Research FAQ, aalas.org. Available from https://www.aalas.org/public-outreach/animal-research-faq [accessed 12 November 2019].
- Humane Society International, (2012) About Animal Testing, Humane Society International. Available from https://www.hsi.org/news-media/about/ [accessed 12 November 2019].
- Bridgeport, J.M, (2009) Do Cosmetic Companies Still Test on Live Animals?. Scientific American. Available from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cosmetics-animal-testing/ [accessed 12 November 2019].
- Costa, R.N., Abreu, C., Presgrave, R.F., Alves, E.N., Presgrave, O., Delgado, I.F. (2011) A reassessment of the in Vitro Total Protein Content Determination (TPC) with SIRC and 3T3 Cells for the Evaluation of the Ocular Irritation Potential of Shampoos: Comparison with the In Vivo Draize Rabbit Test. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. Available from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132011000600008 [accessed 14 November 2019].
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) (2017) Annual Report Animal Usage by Fiscal Year: 2016. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Available from https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/downloads/reports/Annual-Report-Animal-Usage-by-FY2016.pdf [accessed 14 November 2019].
- Understanding Animal Research (2018) Myths and Facts. Understanding Animal Research. Available from http://www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk/animals/how/myths-and-facts/ [accessed 14 November 2019].
- Wright, D., Kazdin, C., Effron, L. (2012) ‘Zoobiquity’: 7 Diseases Animals Share with Humans. AbcNews. Available from https://abcnews.go.com/Health/zoobiquity-diseases-animals-share-humans/story?id=16549555 [accessed 15 November 2019].
- Understanding Animal research (2013) Nine Out of Ten Statistics Are Taken Out of Context. Understanding Animal Research. Available from http://www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk/news/communications-media/nine-out-of-ten-statistics-are-taken-out-of-context/ [accessed 15 November 2019].
- Singer, P. (2009) Animal Liberation, Harper Collins
- Dawkins, R. (2011) But Can They Suffer? BoingBoing. Available from https://boingboing.net/2011/06/30/richard-dawkins-on-v.html [accessed 15 November 2019].
- Speaking of Research (2017) Animal Research Is Not “Animal Testing” Speaking of Research. Available from https://speakingofresearch.com/2013/01/17/animal-research-is-not-animal-testing/ [accessed 16 November 2019].
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.
Related Essays
So many people do not realize how many animals are killed each year in the cosmetic industries. Each year over 100 million animals are tested in the United States, and the numbers of the companies that do animal testing are [...]
Good morning. I am here today to convince you all to oppose, stop, and disengage from the cruel and unnecessary animal testing. Did you know that the lipstick, the eye shadow and the mascara we use to make ourselves look more [...]
Since long time ago animals starting from mice to cows have been used for research. There are lots of examples of testing these or that phenomena on animals. But is it correct? Is it what a human should do? And what well-known [...]
Animal testing is a debated issue over the previous decades. Animal testing in simple words is the use of animals in researches in order to determine the safety of various products such as foods, drugs and cosmetics. People have [...]
Science is quickly progressing, resulting in more experiments and controversial topics. In recent years, common people and scientists are becoming more aware of the inhuman experiments conducted on animal, resulting in the [...]
Animal testing contributed to many life saving cures and treatments. We, humans, share 95% of our genes with a mouse, making them an effective model for the human body. Each year, an average of 5,000 people develop kidney [...]
Every year, millions of animals are used to develop medical advancements, check the safety of products destined for human use, or explore effects of products or procedures. Using animals for these purposes constitutes abuse. [...]
Bullying has impacted many people all around the world. Whether bullying is online, in person, or even through a telephone it hurts many. Books even show how bad bullying can be. The sad part is many children, adults, and [...]
Considering that social media has become the most common way to communicate, cyberbullying is the most common method of bullying. It is important to delete cyberbullying because it is plaguing every user, including our next [...]
Find Free Essays
We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling
Cite this Essay
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:
Related Topics
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
Are you interested in getting a customized paper?
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
- Instructions Followed To The Letter
- Deadlines Met At Every Stage
- Unique And Plagiarism Free
Animal Testing Essays
Animal testing should be banned.
Many organizations are debating whether animal testing ought to be banned in the U. S. Some believe that animal testing ought to be done. At the same time, others believe that animal testing is completely wrong. Some experts believe that other options can be available instead of doing the test on animals. Using animals to test the safety of certain products and for medical research purposes is wrong, and it should be made a point that the pain and suffering […]
Animal Testing is Unethical, Unreliable and Unnecessary
Every year, 100 million animals sit in U.S laboratories caged and waiting to be burned, abused, and infected (Madhusree 1). The test subjects have few rights, protective services, or liberties. The pictures of restrained tormented animals are hidden in a veil of secrecy amongst red lipsticks, sweetener packets, and paints. What the world desires carries a secret pain, and comes at a cost that often goes unnoticed. Despite the scientific advancements achieved through animal testing, scientists should resort to alternative […]
Animal Testing in Medical and Cosmetic Research
Every year there is less and less animal testing done in both medical and cosmetic research. There are plenty of reasons as to why animal testing has been proven to be effective in research experiments. While the beginnings of animal testing were not entirely reassuring of its tactics in the process of testing . However with the time animal testing has been around, it has greatly improved with the advancement of regulations and technology put towards animal testing. Therefore, animal […]
Animal Testing: is it Ethical?
Animals being sacred gifts given to us, they are the best part of our lives and provide us with a special way of love. They do nothing but bring joy and happiness to us. My whole life I’ve grown up with all different kinds of animals. I’ve had a dog named Shelby, two cats Ruby and Smokey, a bird named Cheeks, two hamsters Bernard and Sandy, and I currently have a dog named Rocky and a rabbit named Daisy. I […]
Animal Rights and Society
2. Background information 2.1 What is animal testing Animal testing is different experiments, researches that carried out on the animals. Different animals are used in different test, e.g. mice, rabbits, pigs. Those animals are used to check the safety and assess the effectiveness of the products that for human use, e.g. medicine, food, cosmetics. It’s also used to understand how well the product works on human body. However, all of those tests may harm to animals and cause them physical […]
We will write an essay sample crafted to your needs.
The Cruelty in Animal Testing
Every year in the United States, it is estimated that tens of millions of animals are used for research and testing purposes (Animal Experimentation 50).These animals are usually mice, rats, rabbits, fish, guinea pigs, non-human primates, and other farm animals. Test animals undergo testing for cosmetics and household products, trials for new medicines, and scientific experiments. These tests and experiments are uncomfortable and often painful for the animals. The United States has laws to help protect animals, but there are […]
Using Animals for Medical Testing is both Ethical and Essential?
In this Argumentative essay I have chosen to talk about Animal testing and why I think it is needed in today’s work of medicines and cures. I will be given you four main facts on why I believe it is still very helpful to us humans and even helpful to the animals themselves. Honestly speaking people have become so sensitive in today’s environments about many things like animal feelings, or they think like us humans. They truly forgotten that these […]
Animal Testing and its Importance
From over-the-counter medicine to the shampoo we use, it’s easy to forget how relatively easy our lives have become with the many commodities available to us today. What we do not often consider is how these privileges came to be. What we do not think about is the prevalence of animal testing behind many necessary medicines and products. While controversial, the age-old practice of using animals for scientific and commercial testing has no doubt made many invaluable contributions to our […]
Problems with Animal Testing: Inhumane Practices and Neglected Interests
Abstract The Animal Welfare Act (AWA), enacted in August 1966, regulates the treatment and care of animals in research (Murnaghan 4). However, researchers annually exploit approximately 26 million animals for scientific and commercial testing in the United States (The Flaws and Human Harms ). These exploitations occur while developing medical treatments, determining toxicity levels in medicine, and ensuring the safety of cosmetic products prior to human utilization. While conducting a study on animal welfare, the United States Department of Agriculture […]
Medical Animal Testing should be Banned
Medical animal testing should be banned for there being other humane testing methods that exist. Because there are other alternatives that would replace or relieve animal testing, the use of animals would decrease dramatically. An example of a company who believes in an alternative to animal testing is Procter & Gamble Co. or P&G. Every year they spend $4.5 million on research that advances alternatives to animal testing. Though these alternatives may not replace all animal testing; but, it would […]
New and Safe Treatments for Humanity
Animal testing has long been a means to discover new and safe treatments for humanity. Modern medicines and innovations are constantly being created and updated, creating an ongoing need for ways to test them. There have been many different methods of testing throughout history. By the Roman era, dissection and vivisection (the dissection of live animals) were established scientific practices (Fellenz 72). That was a more official part of animal testing history. Although not technically experimenting, people learned how animal […]
Cruelty to Animals and Animal Testing
Animal cruelty can be defined in many ways: Being violent to animals in any way, failure to provide for animals, being neglectful to animals. Also causing animals psychological harm in the form of distress, torment or terror may also constitute animal cruelty (RSPCA). For example when picking out eyeliner or other makeup products, do people stop to see at the stores what kind of makeup they are buying and using? People could be supporting animal testing and cruelty and not […]
The Controversy of Animal Testing
Imagine a cute white little bunny. You couldn’t even fathom harming this creature, could you? However, every day bunnies, like the one you imagined, are used in trials where they are harmed. I’m sure you’ve heard of companies claiming that they are cruelty free or don’t support animal testing , but are you aware of what animal testing really is and what the animals endure during their trials? Companies every day torture animals in tests that don’t always prove to […]
Many Products are Tested on Animal
Many people may not realize this but most of the products that they are buy have been tested on animals; From makeup and shampoos to dish soaps and clothing. The one I that was surprising to me was finding out that even the white ink that’s in the middle of every M&M has been tested on animals. I know that for some people this may be disturbing but to others it may not mean anything at all and that’s just […]
Effectiveness of Animal Testing
For Centuries animals have been tested on for research all across the globe. These animals can range from elephants to mice and can have an age range from new-borne to oldest surviving. The oldest form of animal testing has been dated back to around 199-217 AD. That’s before the time of some of the earths early great scientists and researchers like Aristotle and Erasistratus. It is still as important today because of how much information we can actually gain from […]
Support of Animal Testing
The arguments of those who support animal testing are understandable in certain situations, and, in these situation the views are valid and their views ought to be respected. And although there are downsides to animal testing and experimenting there’s upsides as well. At the cost of an animal’s life or comfortably humans lives will be saved or given an increased quality of life. In the nineteenth century, physicians could do very little to treat heart disease, because there was no […]
Experimenting on Animals
As the years pass, more and more animals are being terrorized and are being used for testing. Animal testing is when they use animals to test out cosmetics, medicinal products, household cleaners, chemicals, etc (Humane Society International). ‘Peta’ one of the many animal rights groups had only 18 members just four years ago. Now there are more than 23,000 supporters(Robins). The number of people in this group shows how much they are wanting a stop to come to this. This […]
Animal Research for Human Benefit is Unnecessary
Most people believe animal testing is essential to drug and vaccine research. Which is true, in a sense, because scientist have come up with a lot of vaccines for certain viruses. However, during the process, animals are treated poorly and their cages are in awful conditions. Most of the chemicals being administered into these patients are not safe for them, which sometimes results in death. Not only that, animals cannot comprehend what humans can. They cannot speak for themselves. These […]
Vaccine Development
The conversation of animal testing has never been anything less than controversial. Although animal testing is not new, the topic still faces severe criticism by several animal activists’ groups. Humans have used animals as a means to learn about various subjects for a while now. It dates back to uses from Greek-physician scientists “”such as Aristotle, 384 “ 322 BC and Erasistratus, 304 “ 258 BC (Hajar 1). During these experiments’ scientists would use live animals as their test subjects. […]
Opposing Views Animal Testing
The United Nations guarantees a Universal Declaration of Human Rights that asserts that everyone has got a right to liberty, life and also security. Despite that, the declaration protects human beings from cruel treatment, slavery and eventually torture. These rights are considered to be inherent according to the law of land. There has been always a debate on whether animals have got moral rights that should be recognized as well as protected by the human society. In the actual sense, […]
Ethical Issues in Animal Experimentation
There is of course the huge ethical consequence that comes from testing on animals. It is also super expensive to actually test on animals and some of the information from the tests don’t give accurate results for us. Animals are different from humans everyone knows that. That’s money, manpower and time going to waste. It’s also very expensive compared to other options that are out or already developed. The cost of animal testing is enormous and doesn’t always yield results. […]
The Study on Animal Experimentation
Animal testing has been a severe problem that still has not been resolved. Animal testing should be stopped for the safety of animals and human, but since it cannot be, how can it be improved? Many scientists rely on animal testing to collect data on safety and efficacy from experiments. They use animals to test products like food, drugs, cosmetics, medicines, and chemicals. They use animals because animals serve to protect consumers, workers and the environment from the harmful effects […]
The Importance of Animal Models in Vaccines
If you have ever taken any type of medicine or had a vaccine, you have benefited from animal testing: Research with animals led to vaccinations against smallpox, measles, mumps, and tetanus. The world’s first vaccine was tested on a cow in 1796 during the observation of milkmaids who caught cowpox , which is now called smallpox, from infected cow utters. This disease was eradicated in 1980 with the help of lab animals. Looking at the more frequent viruses in our […]
Religion and Culture – Treatment and Rights of Animals
The world has become very advanced through scientific discoveries in the past. As time continues to progress, so does the world ‘s knowledge. New discoveries are made every day that help with diseases and technology. During the developments and discoveries in the scientific field, people find that the richest discoveries in health or medicine generally depend on animal testing. This is mainly due to the many changing perspectives on the relationship between humans and the other aspects of the world […]
Reasons of Animal Cruelty
“The Humane Society of the United States estimates that nearly 1 million animals a year are abused or killed in episodes of domestic violence” (Rajewski). Animal abuse is referred to as an act of intentional mistreatment against animals and is inflicted by humans for reasons other than survival or self-defense. The topic of animal cruelty has been debated for an extremely long time, but nothing has changed for the past decade, and people continue to use violence against animals. It […]
The Definition of Animal Cruelty
The definition of animal cruelty is the infliction by omission or by commission by humans of suffering or harm upon any non-human. A car like any other is driving down the street, rain pounding on the windshield. The girl in the passenger seat sees a dark blur on the side of the road. She focuses on it, and sees a soaked dog, whose fur is severely matted, and covered in mud. Its tail had no wag, and it was so […]
Over One Hundred Million Animals a Year are Murdered for the Sake of Science
Experimentations on animals do not just include dogs and cats, but animals like hamsters, monkeys, birds, and frogs (PETA). Many of the testing is used for companies that sell cosmetics and hygiene products. Chapstick, Lauder, Head & Shoulders, and L’Oreal are just some of the companies that continue to test on animals today. Everyday products that are stored away inside cabinets or in showers could have easily been tested on an animal. Animal testing is wrong, because it is noxious […]
The Americans for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ASPCA
Introduction Service learning and community partnership incorporates academic learning into service projects that becomes more common and popular in today’s community. What it does is teaches us about the history and needs of the agency being helped as well as seeing positive changes that their involvement makes. Just by incorporating different aspects of learning into community service, we can become invested in their work and more likely to stay committed to the cause. The cause of the agency is to […]
What is Animal Cruelty?
Animal cruelty is the act of humans inflicting harm and suffering onto an animal. This can include neglect, animal fighting, and overt abuse. In the United States, an animal is abused every ten seconds. Animal protection organizations are working to stop animal cruelty everywhere. Many of these organizations believe in animal rights and animal welfare. Animal rights activists usually go to the extremes, and will even break laws to make a statement to the public. One point of contention for […]
Types of Animal Cruelty
The definition of animal cruelty varies from person to person and although it is talked about occasionally, many people tend to downplay the seriousness of it. Animal abuse comes in many forms such as scientific research, abandonment, mistreatment, and so on. The experimentation and cruelty committed should be banned because animals share the same basic rights as humans. Without a doubt, mistreatment of animals is the most common form of animal cruelty. It comes in many forms which are: animal […]
Related topic
Essay About Animal Testing Imagine being locked up inside a small and cramped cage with nothing but a feces-filled water bowl that has not been changed for 5 days. The feeling of losing your mind has become inevitable and it seems like “surviving” is impossible. Glancing around the room, you see many creatures are in pain. A mother has been forcefully torn from her newborn she is going insane as she looks desperately for her child, a cat is screaming in agony after it has been performed vivisection on. A garbage bin contains piles of animals rendered useless after vicious quantities of drug intake. You then notice a hand reaching out to grab hold and you wonder. Is it over? Animal research is a controversial topic and has been a popular conversation among the public and in veterinary doctors. Animal testing is wrong and these innocent creatures should not go through this kind of suffering. In all respects, animal testing should be banned because it is inhumane, the test results are often not useful, and there are better alternatives for this issue. Every day, mice, rats, cats, dogs, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, birds and primates are used. They don’t have a voice to speak for themselves. Animals are caught and captured from the wild, stuffed into little crates, and tested for any issues before being relocated. Furthermore, the experimental laboratories shall keep them for as long as they need. This can sometimes mean animals are sentenced to death to serve and submit to these awful treatments. The testing they encounter involve injecting, force-feeding, shocking, dripping medications into their eyes and skin, inhaling toxins, embedding wires inside their brains, and repetitive surgeries. In most cases, animals don’t even receive painkillers or medication after trials. In addition, animals experience pain as humans do. The feeling of pain is something that can be felt internally and expressed through facial and actions it is a mental indication. They may jolt, shriek, whimper, or scream when they cry out in pain. Whenever they are physically abused, it can lead to neurotic related behavior that leaves them disabled. Pacing around in circles, ripping their fur out, and biting themselves are only a couple of the things that could be carried out. We learn to respect each other and try our best to not hurt people around us why can’t we have the same relationship with wildlife? What’s more, is that major results of animal testing end up shown as unsuccessful and useless. According to the National Institute of Health, it was shown that experiments end up neglecting about 92% of their research due to failing when entering the clinical evaluation. The other 8% was shown as medications that had side effects that were not presented in animal testing. Animals don’t have the same disease compared to humans. Multiple examples include heart diseases, cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, and many more. Dr. Richard Klauser, former director of the US National Cancer Research states that: “The history of cancer research has been the history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured cancer in mice for decades and it simply didn’t work on humans.” This can show that not only in mice but most of the 100 million animals used, do not always show the same results as expected and can be misleading. Another report has shown that the US Drug & Food Administrator in 2017, only ended certifying 46 new drugs after testing on 115 million animals globally. It was concluded that these drugs weren’t even needed as common cures but were rare diseases. Lastly, observations usually turn out as unreliable and dangerous. This is because both species have huge biological difference humans and animals have different responses to illnesses, substances and healing approaches. Not all of the assumptions that the chances of imitating an animal as their “model” will not always have the same effect. Not everyone needs new shades of lipstick when there are already so many shades available. Dripping these cosmetic products into the eyes and skins of rabbits to sell in shops don’t benefit society- what more could we ask for? Research has found that the Draize skin irritation in rabbits will only show up 60% efficiency on humans. In other cases, using remodeled human skin can boost the results up to 86%. Science is expanding and scientists are gradually finding new ways to improve the lifestyle of humans. Alternatives include cell manipulation, human tissue from donors, computer models, synthetic skin, and volunteer studies. With that, animal testing should not be limiting the opportunity of opening up to more effective methods of analysis. There is always an option to approach a scenario differently. Then why is it taking so long for others to understand that animal testing is beyond cruel? If people were to imagine themselves in the shoes of these creatures, would they want to live every day in pain? Essentially, animals should be free of these torture devices and know that they have the right to be unconfined, not impersonated, killed, or carry trails out on. The purpose that many need to understand is that animals aren’t for people to use but instead to cherish. With that, stopping harsh treatments, rid of unnecessary testing, and have more options to animal testing. Just imagine it: asking yourself the question “We don’t have a solution for animal testing.”. But instead, “We don’t have a solution for animal testing just yet.” Would the world not already have humans and animals living peacefully together?
1. Tell Us Your Requirements
2. Pick your perfect writer
3. Get Your Paper and Pay
short deadlines
100% Plagiarism-Free
Certified writers
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Without animal testing some medicines would have harmed humans. Animal testing is a much safer way to test these medicines before they reach humans. Animal
Animal testing is necessary because it helps develop life saving medical treatments for not only humans, but animals, and it helps determine how medicine will
They have helped us more than we can ever imagine. Thanks to animals, we have advanced in all areas of living. Our medical standards are higher and our
Argumentative Essay. Should animals be used for research? Using animals for testing is extremely cruel, animals deserve rights, and it should be illegal
Therefore, animal testing allows the evaluation of the danger of drugs before being used upon humans which will greatly reduce the risk before
Animals should be used for scientific and medical research because the contributions they provide to the world lead to life saving cures, they are the only test
Animals should be used for scientific and medical research because the contributions they provide to the world lead to life saving cures, they are the only test
It is done in order to ensure the effects of tests and for the sake of animals. · When writing a pro animal testing essay, it is important to
An example of this is the Polio vaccine. When testing on animals to further understand this disease, a cure was eventually found; this then lead
What it does is teaches us about the history and needs of the agency being helped as well as seeing positive changes that their involvement makes. Just by