California Bar Examination
Examination Questions
Essay Questions and Selected Answers
Performance Tests and Selected Answers
- Study Aids Form
First-Year Law Students' Examination
[email protected]
Practicing Law in California as a Foreign Attorney
Passing the Essay Portion of the California Bar Exam: Insider Tips and Strategies
- Dec 2, 2022
February 2023 California Bar Exam Predictions
- May 10, 2022
July 2022 California Bar Exam Predictions
- Dec 20, 2021
February 2022 California Bar Exam Predictions
- Jun 7, 2021
July 2021 California Bar Exam Predictions
- Dec 29, 2020
February 2021 California Bar Exam Predictions
- Sep 27, 2020
A closer look at our predictions for the October 2020 California Bar Exam
- May 31, 2020
October 2020 California Bar Exam Predictions
- Feb 5, 2020
A closer look at our predictions for the February 2020 California Bar Exam
- Nov 21, 2019
February 2020 California Bar Exam Predictions
- Sep 24, 2019
Breaking down Essay Grading by the California Bar Exam
- Jul 17, 2019
What to do the day before the California bar exam?
- Jul 5, 2019
How to approach Business Associations on the California Bar Exam
- Jul 2, 2019
Memorization Tips for the California Bar Exam – Active vs. Passive Repetition
- Jun 29, 2019
California Bar Exam 30 day study schedule
- Jun 26, 2019
How to write a passing Evidence Essay on the California Bar Exam
- Jun 25, 2019
How to write a passing Professional Responsibility Essay on the California Bar Exam
- Jun 24, 2019
Hot Topics for July 2019 California Bar Exam
- Jun 20, 2019
Cal Bar Bible Business Associations Essay Tracking
- 0 Shopping Cart $ 0.00 -->
Looking to pass the MPRE? Sign up for our free five-star course here !
We are excited to announce that our students had an 88.88% pass rate on the July 2022 bar exam! Check out our bar exam courses here — they are on sale for a limited time!
Named one of the fastest growing companies in the United States. Thank you for your support!
Chapter 3: California Bar Exam Essay Frequency Chart
California bar exam essay frequency chart.
Here, we provide you with a California Bar Exam essay frequency chart that shows the frequency subjects have been tested on the California Bar Exam.
You will notice a few things:
- First, the most frequently tested essay subject by far is Professional Responsibility . Professional Responsibility is tested on its own and is also frequently combined with other subjects. (Occasionally, it will appear on the performance test portion instead of the essay portion of the exam but, as you can see, that is not common.)
- Agency and Partnership is not highly tested (but when it is tested, it is very predictable). Agency and Partnership and Corporations used to be separate subjects on the California Bar Exam. Now, Agency and Partnership and Corporations are included under the subject Business Associations . However, for your benefit, we have listed when each individual subject was tested in the chart below.
- Some subjects, such as Civil Procedure, Criminal Law and Procedure, and Torts, tend not to be combined with other subjects when they are tested. Other subjects, such as Professional Responsibility, Business Associations (Agency and Partnership plus Corporations), Remedies, Trusts, and Wills tend to be combined with other subjects on a regular basis.
Note: we had initially classified the February 2022 exam as a Real Property question (as it tested nuisance, which has always been classified as Real Property). However, this administration the Examiners decided to classify it as Torts (combined with Remedies). Thus, the updated chart is above!
Wondering which california topics are tested most frequently .
Check out our California Bar Exam One-Sheets ! We cover the highly tested California topics within a subject in one page, front and back.
Go to the next topic, Chapter 4: Agency and Partnership .
Looking to pass the california bar exam.
Free or discounted resources
- A five-star bar exam course (for as low as $1149.99!) that provides you with the best instruction, outlines, and questions. Preview our course for free here !
- Free popular bar exam guides (a CA bar exam essay guide , a guide on how to pass the bar exam , and a guide to hiring a bar exam tutor ) written by bar exam experts!
- Our new Free Bar Exam Resource Center , which includes our most popular free guides, posts, webinars, and more!
- A free Early Bar Prep Course for law students
Other resources
Our most POPULAR and highly rated bar exam resources are:
- Our On Demand Bar Exam Course
- Our NEW California Essay Exam Mastery Class , which covers the highly tested and difficult California bar exam issues!
- California and Baby Bar Exam Private Tutoring by bar exam experts
- CA One-Sheets and Baby Bar One-Sheets —rated five stars! Our customers love these supplements!
- Real MBE questions —the best practice questions available!
You can read more about our California Bar Exam services here.
Related posts
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Use
By using this site, you allow the use of cookies, and you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service .
Cookie and Privacy Settings
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.
Actions Panel
February 2022 california bar exam essay workshop - evidence.
February 2022 California Bar Exam - Evidence Essay Workshop Presented by BarEssays.com
When and where
Date and time.
Sun, January 30, 2022 , 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM PST
Refund Policy
About this event.
- Online Events
- Online Seminars
- Online Family & Education Seminars
- #exam_preparation
About the organizer
Follow this organizer to stay informed on future events.
Events you might like
California Placement Association Monthly Webinar California Placement Association Monthly Webinar
California colleges: stanford, berkeley, ucla california colleges: stanford, berkeley, ucla, california peer support specialist exam preparation california peer support specialist exam preparation, servsafe® exam session w/ proctor - northern california servsafe® exam session w/ proctor - northern california, top 5 landlord questions - northern california edition top 5 landlord questions - northern california edition, eon experience fest - california 2023 - live streaming eon experience fest - california 2023 - live streaming, giving evidence as an expert witness giving evidence as an expert witness, women artists of california, 1850–1940 (virtual program) women artists of california, 1850–1940 (virtual program), evidence collecting against regulated activities evidence collecting against regulated activities, mental wellbeing programs and guidelines: where is the evidence mental wellbeing programs and guidelines: where is the evidence.
Make This Your Last Time
A candid, no-BS look at bar exam preparation
Graded Bar Exam Essay Answer Bank
Are you writing bar exam essays the way the graders want? One way to check your work is to see graded essays, including high- and low-scoring answers from actual bar takers.
To that end, you’ll find two things here:
- Mostly for California. Other states like New York and Nevada are also available.
- For more actual essays from California takers, check out BarEssays ( click here to grab a $25 coupon ).
- Below the essay bank is a link to California bar essay issue charts by subject and year.
Real graded CA bar essays (some other states available)
Essay Question 1 (Contracts): 67.5 (65/70), 62.5 (65/60), 55 , 52.5 (55/50), 65 , 55
Essay Question 2 (Constitutional Law): 57.5 (60/55), 55 (55/55), 55 , 60 (60/60), 60 , 55
Essay Question 3 (Professional Responsibility): 62.5 (60/65), 60 (55/65), 50 , 62.5 (60/65), 65 , 55
Essay Question 4 (Business Associations): 55 (55/55), 57.5 (60/55), 45 , 60 (60/60), 50 , 55
Essay Question 5 (Wills/Community Property): 57.5 (55/60), 62.5 (60/65), 60 , 57.5 (60/55), 55 , 50
California 90-minute PT (Objective Memo – Torts): 75 (75/75), 65 (65/65), 60 , 60 (60/60), 65 , 55
New York MEEs and MPTs: Set 1
Nevada Essays and NPTs: Set 1
Selected answers for 2022 July MEEs and MPTs
The essays are generally structured fine. Formulaic IRAC is a good way to organize arguments.
Regarding the second essay specifically (Con Law), there were more free speech issues in the first call of the question, such as whether content-based or content-neutral rules apply in a public school. I didn’t see respective rules for those (strict scrutiny for the content-based, for example). I think you did well hitting on those threshold issues like overbreadth, but you may have missed more important issues.
This leads me to think that perhaps you are getting some issues right but not others. I encourage you to study when the selected answers get posted on the state bar website (or here ) to see which issues they discussed and how they’re resolved.
I think that you may also need to connect the rules to the facts, rather than simply listing out facts in your application paragraphs. I noticed this in the third essay (Professional Responsibility). One way is to use the word “because.”
I wanted to add that you did a good job on the PT. This is where some people lose a lot of points when they neglect it since it’s worth 2x an essay.
Essay 1 (Criminal Law and Procedure): 67.5 (70/65), 70 (65/75) , 67.5 (80/55), 65 (65/65), 50 , 67.5 (60/75), 55 , 65
Essay 2 (Community Property): 72.5 (80/65), 57.5 (55/60), 65 (65/65), 65 (65/65), 60 , 65 (70/60), 55 , 65
Essay 3 (Torts, Remedies): 62.5 (65/60), 52.5 (55/50), 55 (55/55), 57.5 (60/55), 55 , 60 (60/60), 60
Essay 4 (Evidence, Professional Responsibility): 52.5 (55/50), 50 (50/50), 65 (65/65), 57.5 (60/55), 55 , 62.5 (65/60), 55 , 70
Essay 5 (Business Associations, Remedies): 65 (60/70), 62.5 (65/60), 65 (70/60), 62.5 (60/65), 60 , 57.5 (55/60), 55
California 90-minute PT (objective memo): 52.5 (55/50), 60 (65/55), 57.5 (55/60), 57.5 (55/60), 55 , 60 (65/55), 55 , 60
Some things to focus on:
- Lay out the rules first. However, try to only introduce rules that you are going to use. This keeps your answer tight and gives you more time to talk about the facts and other issues. If you are spending a ton of time writing about the rules, you may not have that luxury. Also, don’t introduce new rules after you start talking about the facts or applying another rule.
- Focus on completely identifying the issues. Ask yourself, what are they trying to test you on with these fact patterns? The more you solve similar fact patterns, the more you’ll see issue patterns you can whip out on the exam. Also, sometimes it’s better to have more issues identified with less analysis, especially for broad calls of the question. Professional Responsibility is one such subject where you want to focus on the issues and rules first (cook the essay), then fill in your analysis as time allows.
- Be clear with your organization and presentation. You want to make it easy for the grader to know what issue you’re discussing, what the rule is, and where you are applying the rule. And of course what your conclusion is. Use headings and paragraphs liberally. The easier you are to understand, the more likely they will give you points. Remember that reading thousands of these essays is exhausting for the grader. Give them a breath of fresh air. Writing bar essays isn’t just about legal knowledge; it’s doing a service for your client.
- Address all the questions completely.
From the applicant:
Here are a few of my thoughts:
- Essay #1 – The 25 point discrepancy between the first and second grader makes absolutely no sense to me. When I read my response, I cannot understand how I possibly could have been given a 55 by the second grader.
- Essay #3 – I broke out all the elements for the equitable remedies (TROs, Preliminary Injunctions, Permanent Injunctions) because this was a remedies-heavy question. So again, not sure what I did to receive only a 55 on this essay.
- PT – Because the bar exam was back in person in February, I had the ability to make a strategic decision to do my PT first (before Essay #4 and #5), which I did. All I could hear anyone talking about after the afternoon session on the first day was how they did not finish the PT. This made me feel even more confident because I did finish. I even spent 5 extra minutes on the PT to make sure it was bulletproof to avoid what happened to me on the PT in July. In July, I missed the infamous “Blue Pencil” issue and did not finish concluding. Yet, I got the same exact score on the PT in February as I did in July. When I walked out of the afternoon session on day 1, I thought I at least got a 65 on the PT, but I honestly was expecting a 70 or 75. With how much the PT is worth, this dropped my raw writing score significantly.
- MBEs – my percentiles went up in most areas compared to the July bar, but my scaled score was lower. I understand the scaling changes for each exam, but not quite sure what else I can do for the MBEs when I spent 90% of my time during bar prep preparing for the MBEs.
My feedback:
First, I have to say that this was one of the hardest CA exams, with a 33.9% pass rate as you know. Even with a higher raw written score, you received a lower scaled score. Unfortunately, that’s just the casualty of whatever statistical adjusting they do. Theoretically, scaled scores are equivalent to one another… Theoretically.
Essay 1 :
I agree with you that the disparity in scores for Essay 1 is unusual. I don’t see how it deserves a 55. You pretty much did textbook IRAC, identified numerous issues, and organized and presented it all in a clean format. The only thing I can think of is that you didn’t actually connect the rules to the facts step by step. If you analogize it to an algebra problem, each line is a small step to the answer. Here’s an example:
Rule = perfect. (Note that I also had perfect rules on my first attempt.)
- “Here, Jim and Fred both armed themselves with handguns and went to the store on Avon street.” Great.
- “As an accomplice, Jim can be liable for any foreseeable crimes if he aided, encouraged, or abetted the crimes.” What made Jim an accomplice? The bridge is missing. One way to tell if you are bridging the rule to a relevant fact is if you can use the word “because.” The better thing to say here is to say what Jim did that would qualify as aiding, encouraging, or abetting. I don’t think the facts say such a thing.
- “Here, it can be inferred that Jim partook in these crimes and aided, encouraged, or abetted the target crimes and any foreseeable crimes.” I disagree with the “inferred” part. You should cite a fact from the hypo to support this. You talk about conspiracy below this, which is closer to what happened in the fact pattern.
My guess is that the 2nd reader read the essay more carefully since it was a reread in the gray zone.
I didn’t read through the rest in the interest of time, but one thing that’s evident is that essay grading is subjective. Hence, any “best practices” you can do to make it easy for the grader to give you points will help. I think your formatting is nice and clean. I love how you break down the issues, and you know your rules. You’re in a great place in terms of knowledge. Perhaps better usage of the facts will help next time around.
Essay 3 :
You did a great job on the remedies question. When the selected answers come out, take a look at what other torts there could have been. At first glance, you probably got the major ones.
Without doing a deep dive, I can only say that it was hard to see where the application of the facts was. I saw a lot of statutes being recited, and noticed your usage of facts in the middle of one of the paragraphs.
Raw written score :
Your average written score is 61.8 (432.5 / 7). You needed a 62.78 for this exam. That’s just 7 more raw points (~439.5 vs. 432.5). Can’t help but think that you would have “passed” the essay portion if they’d kept your first read.
VIDEO: review and breakdown of the 5th set of essays
Essay 1 (Civil Procedure): 65 , 55 , 55 , 55 , 62.5 , 50 , 50 , 65
Essay 2 (Professional Responsibility): 60 , 65 , 50 , 50 , 57.5 , 50 , 75 , 62.5
Essay 3 (Torts): 55 , 55 , 51 (adjusted for ExamSoft issue), 65 , 62.5 , 55 , 55 , 65
Essay 4 (Criminal Procedure): 50 , 60 , 50 , 60 , 62.5 , 65 , 65 , 65
Essay 5 (Wills, Community Property): 70 , 55 , 50 , 65 , 72.5 , 60 , 60 , 57.5
California 90-minute PT: 55 , 55 , 55 , 55 , 60 , 45 , 55 , 55
- PT-only donation: 65
Essay 1 (Evidence): 55 , 45 , 52.5
Essay 2 (Contracts & Remedies): 60 , 50 , 60
Essay 3 (Community Property): 55 , 65 , 80
Essay 4 (Professional Responsibility): 50 , 60 , 62.5
Essay 5 (Real Property): 50 , 50 , 52.5
California 90-minute PT: 60 , 45 , 55
Second column of essays has some of my annotations in bubble comments.
Essay 1 (Professional Responsibility): 57.5 , 50
Essay 2 (Business Associations – Corporations): 52.5 , 50
Essay 3 (Real Property): 57.5 , 55
Essay 4 (Criminal Law & Procedure): 62.5 , 55
Essay 5 (Remedies – Contracts): 55 , 55
California 90-minute PT: 52.5 , 50
Essay 1 (Torts): 60 , 70 , 57.5 , 60 , 50
Essay 2 (Professional Responsibility): 65 , 75 , 57.5 , 57.5 , 60
Essay 3 (Contracts Remedies): 60 , 65 , 52.5 , 60 , 60
Essay 4 (CA Evidence): 65 , 60 , 57.5 , 70 , 65
Essay 5 (Business Associations): 65 , 55 , 65 , 65 , 55
California 90-minute PT: 57.5 , 60 , 60 , 55 , 70
The recurring theme I see in your essays (nice job on the PT) is that issues are missing. I think your IRACing is good. However, you can’t do the IRACs if you don’t bring up the I (issue) in the first place.
To this end, Approsheets may be helpful. In addition, I’ve heard good things about Mary Basick’s blue book (2nd ed.)
Sample answers aren’t out yet, but I’d suggest looking at the higher-scoring answers in the essay answer bank for reference
Examples of things you could have discussed:
Q1. NIED. What recovery is possible (part of the questions)
Q2. PR essays typically have general calls (what violations or obligations are there)… Issue identification is especially important.
Q3. Valid contract formation. Could have discussed more specific sub-rules and corresponding facts for the elements for specific performance (final call of the question)
Lesser point: Since you’re handwriting, presentation becomes more important. Try to leave enough spacing between issues and discussions so that it’s easier for the grader to see where discussions end and begin.
Essay 1 (Civil Procedure): 55 , 55 , 55 , 50 , 62.5 , 65 , 60 , 55 , 65
Essay 2 (Remedies, Con Law): 60 , 62.5 , 70 , 55 , 62.5 , 52.5 , 55 , 72.5 , 50 , 60
Essay 3 (Criminal Law and Procedure): 55 , 60 , 55 , 60 , 57.5 , 65 , 55 , 55 , 70
Essay 4 (Prof Resp): 60 , 55 , 50 , 50 , 55 , 52.5 , 55 , 65 , 55 , 55
Essay 5 (Contracts): 60 , 57.5 , 60 , 55 , 57.5 , 55 , 65 , 70 , 60 , 55
California 90-minute PT: 55 , 60 , 60 , 65 , 62.5 , 55 , 70 , 60 , 60
My assessment of essays in the 5th column of essays above (in bold ).
Essay and PT set 1 (scores: Q1 55, Q2 57.5, Q3 62.5, Q4 55, Q5 57.5, PT 70)
Essay and PT set 2 (scores: Q1 55, Q2 62.5, Q3 60, Q4 60, Q5 62.5, PT 62.5)
Essay 1 (Wills, Trusts, Community Property): 70 , 60 , 55 , 65
Essay 2 (Torts): 57.5 , 65 , 65
Essay 3 (Real Property): 52.5 , 62.5 , 60 , 65/70
Essay 4 (Civil Procedure, Evidence): 65 , 55 , 60
Essay 5 (Prof Resp): 55 , 52.5 , 60
California 90-minute PT: 57.5 , 60 , 60 , 65/60
Essay 1 (Contracts): 60 , 55
Essay 2 (Evidence): 65 , 65
Essay 3 (Prof Resp): 75 (sample from BarEssays ), 55
Essay 4 (CA Comm Prop): 60 , 55
Essay 5 (Con Law): 55 , 50
California 90-minute PT: 55 , 55
Essay and PT answers set 1 (scores: Q1 60, Q2 50, Q3 50, Q4 55, Q5 50, PT 55)
Essay and PT answers set 2 (scores: Q1 65, Q2 57.5, Q3 55, Q4 65, Q5 55, PT 60)
New York : 2018 July New York (UBE) MEE and MPT set (MEE 1-6 scores in order 57.06, 44.55, 55.46, 41.42, 53.79, 40.09; MPT scores in order 49.42, 52.44; total 137.7)
Essay 1: 55 ( Brian’s Annotations )
Essay 2: 60
Essay 3: 60
Essay 4: 65 ( Brian’s Annotations )
Essay 5: 65
California 90-minute PT: 65
Essay and PT answers set 1 (scores: Q1 55, Q2 55, Q3 65, Q4 50, Q5 60, PT 60)
Essay and PT answers set 2 (scores: Q1 55, Q2 60, Q3 55, Q4 70, Q5 60, PT 50)
Essay 1: 60 , 72.5 , 60 , 65 , 60 , 65 , 60
Essay 2: 60 , 62.5 , 60 , 60 , 55 , 55 , 65
Essay 3: 65 , 62.5 , 65 , 55 , 55 , 50 , 50
Essay 4: 60 , 65 , 65 , 70 , 60 , 60 , 65
Essay 5: 65 , 62.5 , 60 , 60 , 55 , 55 , 60
California 90-minute PT: 65 , 57.5 , 75 , –, –, 55 , 45
Essay 1: –, 62.5 , 60 , 55 , 50
Essay 2: –, 57.5 , 55 , 60 , 50
Essay 3: –, 65 , 55 , 70 , 65
Essay 4: –, 60 , 60 , 60 , 50
Essay 5: –, 65 , 60 , 55 , 65
Essay 6: –, 65 , 60 , 60 , 60
PT A: 57.5 , 70 , 55 , 70 , 65
PT B: 60 , 60 , 70 , 65 , 60
Essay 1: 55 , 65 , 65 , 55 , 55
Essay 2: 55 , 55 , 60 , 55 , 45
Essay 3: 60 , 50 , 60 , 55 , 55
Essay 4: 55 , 65 , 55 , 55 , 50
Essay 5: 55 , 60 , 75 , 60 , 55
Essay 6: 50 , 60 , 50 , 55 , 55
PT A: –, –, 50 , 50 , 55
PT B: 50 , –, 60 , 60 , 55
Essay and PT answers set 1 (scores: Q1 55, Q2 60, Q3 45, Q4 60, Q5 65, Q6 60, PT A 50, PT B 55)
Essay and PT answers set 2 (scores: Q1 55, Q2 50, Q3 50, Q4 50, Q5 55, Q6 50, PT A 55, PT B 60)
Essay and PT answers set 3 (scores: Q1 60, Q2 57.5, Q3 65, Q4 52.5, Q5 65, Q6 60, PT A 60, PT B 57.5)
Nevada : Essays Day 1 (scores in order: 63.32, 90.06, 71.40 / 75.00 passing), MPTs (score in order: 67.50, 51.91 / 75.00 passing), Essays Day 3 (scores in order: 61.52, 93.47, 76.43, 78.82 / 75.00 passing)
Essay 1: 60 , 65 , 62.5
Essay 2: 50 , 60 , 60
Essay 3: 50 , 55 , 60
Essay 4: 60 , 70 , 55
Essay 5: 50 , 55 , 57.5
Essay 6: 50 , 60 , 57.5
PT A: 55 , 55
PT B: 65 , 70
My analysis of the first column of essays and PTs above (in bold ) (my estimated scores before actual scores were sent to me + my evaluation of the answers and suggestions)
Essay and PT answers set 1 (scores: Q1 55, Q2 60, Q3 65, Q4 50, Q5 60, Q6 50, PT A 60, PT B 70)
Essay and PT answers set 2 (ZIP file with images; scores: Q1 55, Q2 75, Q3 65, Q4 55, Q5 50, Q6 50, PT A 55, PT B 60)
Essay and PT answers set 3 (scores: Q1 50, Q2 50, Q3 50, Q4 60, Q5 55, Q6 55, PT A 55, PT B 55)
Essay 1: 60
Essay 2: 65
Essay 4: 55
Essay 5: 55
Essay 6: 60
PT A: 60
PT B: 55
Essay and PT answers set 1 (scores in order: Q1 60, Q2 55, Q3 55, Q4 60, Q5 55, Q6 55; PT A 50, PT B 50)
Essay and PT answers set 2 (scores in order: Q1 60/55, Q2 75/85, Q3 60/55, Q4 65/65, Q5 65/60, Q6 60/60; PT A 55/55, PT B 60/60)
Essay 1: 65
Essay 3: 55
Essay 6: 55
PT B: 70
New York : 2014 July New York essay answers set (scaled scores in order: 60.82, 44.77, 43.83, 40.62, 45.01, 31.66)
Essay and PT answers set 1 (scores in order: Q1-6 55, 55, 55, 55, 55, 55; PTs 55, 60)
Essay 1: 65 , 60
Essay 2: 55 , 50
Essay 3: 55 , 50
Essay 4: 50 , 55
Essay 5: 50 , 55
Essay 6: 60 , 60
PT A: 55 , 65 , 70
PT B: 60 , 55
Issue Outlines
Sample legacy (3-hour) CA PT answers by Brian
PT 2008 FEB B (Dr. Snyder) — with grader commentary PT 2006 FEB B (Estate of Small) — with grader commentary and self-analysis PT 2012 FEB B (State v. Dolan) — self-graded PT 2009 JULY A (Farley) — self-graded PT 2010 JULY A (Vasquez CC&Rs) — self-graded with notes, comments, and questions Snow King Mountain Resort answer , notes Pearson
California essay and issue charts by subject
Anonymous donor’s how-to-use: Barbri has a different chart that has the subjects in the left column, the month and year of the test along the top row, and the question number where the subject and test date intersect, but creating the chart this way made me focus on my weakest subjects instead of trying to predict which topics would be tested. There were certain subjects where I missed a lot of issues, e.g., constitutional law and community property, because I didn’t take ConLaw II or CP in law school.
Instead of doing the same amount of essays for each subject, I’d only outline the subjects that I’d spotted most of the issues for and use my extra time reviewing how the essays were organized in my weakest subjects for as many essays as I could. Having a chart allowed me to find those essays faster, compare how they were written from year to year, and create a template for how to approach issues that I hadn’t learned in law school.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
This publication contains the five essay questions from the February 2022 California Bar. Examination and two selected answers for each question.
FEBRUARY 2022. ESSAY QUESTIONS 1, 2 AND 3. California. Bar. Examination. Answer all 3 questions; each question is designed to be answered in.
Past Exam Questions for the California Bar Exam and the First-Year Law Students' Exam.
We review Essay Question #1 from the 2022 February CA Bar Exam as a class.One-Timers has posted an answer to Essay 1 – Criminal Law and
We review Essay Question #5 from the 2022 February CA Bar Exam as a class.NOTE: The essay review is no longer than 20 minutes.
0:00 Essay Question 1 (Crim Law & Crim Pro)10:29 Essay Question 2 (CA Community Property)11:37 Essay Question 3 (Torts, Remedies)16:05 Essay
Bar breakers. California bar essay. Cal PT Bar code cheat sheets ... Aug 29, 2022.
Passing the Essay Portion of the California Bar Exam: Insider Tips and Strategies ... February 2022 California Bar Exam Predictions.
Note: we had initially classified the February 2022 exam as a Real
Eventbrite - BarEssays.com presents February 2022 California Bar Exam Essay Workshop - Evidence - Sunday, January 30, 2022 - Find event and ticket
Real graded CA bar essays (some other states available). 2022 July2022 February2021 July2021 February2020 October2020 February2019 July2019 February2018